Lmao

but customer service is limited scope

I wonder if the people that call other people bots will be confused with actual bots

Idubbbz latest video calling people who buy lottery tickets stupid is p dank

When Ferrara started on this work, he felt he had developed his own sixth sense for sniffing out artificial intelligence on Twitter. Now he is no longer so confident. “Today it is not clear to me that I interact with as many humans as I thought I did,” he says. “We look hard at some accounts, we run them through the algorithm and it is undecided. Quite often now it is a coin toss. The language seems too good to be true.”

😄 😄

Genius

No wonder npc accounts confound them

Lol

now i need to google "dog fouling"

thanks tim

At some point political bots entered the fray, mostly on Twitter, with the intent of spreading propaganda and misinformation. Originally these seem to have been the work of individual hackers, before the techniques were adopted by organised and lavishly funded groups. These bots, Ferrara suggests, proved to be a highly efffective way to broadcast extremist viewpoints and spread conspiracy theories, but also were programmed to search out such views from other, genuine accounts by liking, sharing, retweeting and following, in order to give them disproportionate prominence. It is these bots that the social media platforms have been trying to cull in the wake of investigations into the 2016 American election by Robert Mueller and others. Twitter has taken down a reported 6m bot accounts this year.

<:commie:463087263153258506>

@shanepottermi have you seen the average instagram, buzzfeed, etc user.... would be more intelligent with random chance then those people

remember that time we enforced server communism

So basically, progressive viewpoints resemble AI user accounts more?

Btw the end of the article is

👌

I suggest to him that there seems to be a grain of hope in the fact that people are reaching out in greater numbers toward trusted, fact-checked news sources: subscriptions to the New York Times and the Washington Post are up (and the Guardian and Observer just notched up a million online supporters).

“It’s true,” he says. “But then I have a chart on my screen which I am looking at as I talk to you. It gives live information on the sources of things being retweeted by different groups. Way at the top is Breitbart: 31%. Second: Fox News. Then the Gateway Pundit [a far-right news site]. Looking at this,” he says, “it is like we haven’t yet learned anything from 2016.”

uh oh.. youtube got 500 error

only if you follow certain people

of course zuckerberg is a 5 on the turing test I assume

seems just on the subscription page

more than that. Just go to youtube in private mode, and you'll see it working, until you log in

I can still watch videos tho... so I can watch the video of Tim sh*ting all over my country 😛

fouling your country.

Did youtube go down again?

seems so

*sighs* lets go get the pitchforks

i'm on it

watching latest video

or at least their search function is down

Man

only some pages

we need to train dogs to shit on minorities' yards

youtubes fucking itself

Where were you on the day Youtube died

is just the main chan copied to bitchute? or second too?

on the UK dog thing... you have to understand in 2015 there was a MASSIVE push to get everyone to report "hate crimes"

Interesting

You can click direct links