The popes pacifism and lack of confrontation can absolutely be seen as “kiked” but no where has he been directly anti-Christian.

Star of remphan all over everything kinda gives it away imo

Xtianity is kiked to its core

It's inception

The Catholics and Orthodox are more pagan than Christian though.

If you’ve noticed, Celtic pagans have their own form of Christianity that isn’t strictly aligning with the Papacy.

The holiest depiction of woman is a kike bitch

Yes, the relics and images of the Holy Family.

They are, indeed, Semitic.

But does that mean we worship them as semites, or the principles they preached?

It’s the same logic as: Do we worship George Washington as a person or for his philosophy and accomplishments?

Their still is many European saints of Christianity, predominantly Christian history, the scholars, monks and everything else is European.

We were principled before they killed more of us than the Muslim

There is no doubt that it is no longer the same Semitic faith of its origin, but evolved to a truly European shaped religion.

It's anti-european in every way

Not really, the Bible preaches peace but it doesn’t condemn war, it does not condemn nationalism, it doesn’t condemn patriotism or racial beliefs.

But it does condemn harmful vices such as selfishness.

True religion uses reason and pursues what is conducive to life. That is why there is no real beauty or justice in Abrahamic religions. Christianity will continue to pervert and destroy us if we don't shed it off; it has no power to save civilization or the White race, both of which it has held prisoner for far too long.

Christianity did nothing to establish a code of civilization; it came along, stole it from the Greeks and Romans, toppled it and erased much of the greatest pagan wisdom, caused a Dark Age, persecuted pagans instead of defending Europe from Muslims, caused millions of European deaths through dogmatic wars, and laid the foundation for the anti-civilizational forces of modernity. This is all laid out in my book, in Shadia Drury's Terror and Civilization, in Gillespie's Theological Origins of Modernity, in Siniossoglou's Plato and Theodoret, Catherine Nixey's The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World, and many other places; it is a well-established fact that Christianity has been the cause of our downfall and our divergence from true virtues (ie "pagan" or "classical" virtues). Christianity is a great detriment and plague that needs to be eradicated completely and permanently.

Christianity renounces this world and welcomes the stranger and is hung up on shortsighted immediate charity. There is no room to value race or preserve it at the expense of others in it. My book has done the work of laying out correct thinking, demonstrating the fatal errors of Christianity, and establishing a correct way to think about moral questions about race and eugenics. There is no room for this in Christianity. Why preserve this disease by getting people to rally behind deluded and indefensible fringe interpretations of Christianity when they will be more ready to just abandon it for the glorious true religions? Forget Christianity.

There are already many living traditions with established virtues and values out there which excel far beyond what Christianity is capable of imagining.

Crusades happened out of necessity, the Bible (Old testament) even clearly states that war is justified in self defense.

They invaded Europe!

The crusades killed more pagan Europeans than Muslims

I don’t agree that Christianity “invaded”. They came and preached a new path to the poor and downtrodden, and due to their nonviolence and lack of resistance to being punished and struck repeatedly, their principles became more appealing.

Although I do not agree with the paranoia of paganism within Christianity. That is more of suppression than it is holy.

The Monks can become warriors, because it is within their blood.

Peace must be maintained, even if it means killing. And the Knights of the Crusades knew this.

That's how it started, yes

They went to the holy land to start hospitals, charities and kitchens.

And they came out as Warrior cultures.

But then European xtians in the form of crusaders killed their own volk

If we observe the warrior culture of the Teutonic Knights and observe the Berserker of Norse-Germanic culture, what difference is there?

Religion and origin.

But the similarities?

They are known as fierce warriors, can snap into blind rage to where one man can take down a shield wall in his state of frenzy. The Teutonic Knights took on 2/3rds of the Slavic world and majority of the pagan world In one war, even fighting **Catholic** Poland who spearheaded the pagan coalition to end the Teutonic order.

If the Teutonic Knights started as monks, they ended as warriors on par with pagan berserkers.

We can sit here for hours and debate over the Semitic origin and the extent of its influence, but we’re getting no where by doing this tango.

Your previous argument is incredibly disingenuous to two cultures

The similarities end at warrior culture

Yes, and their legacy is on par.