though that usually requires work

Except that wasnt defined in the philosophy and is a contradiction as it cannot be maintained consistently

indeed

that why its flawed

I for one believe money is necessary to achieve or maintain happiness

@SantaSoc http://www.dichotomytests.com/results.html?id=0&m=-10&e=-35&i=32.5&h=-47.5&n=-47.5&r=-15&s=20 also neutral

I got 50/50 for a reason

@SantaSoc So if you threw man in the wild can money obtain happiness or if he gets rich

Dunno that I agree with my results tho

Neither do I

These tests arent that accurate though

Its just a rough guess

I don't think I am spiritual

Sure

My argument, is that in a situation with given choice of attainment. Money is necessary.

In what context?

I think I'm definitely more "spiritual", just not religious

Games make me happpy

I am materialist

By the definition they seem to use

A full blown

Matter is all

But i still need money to use or obtain access to play games

That will eventually stagnate as it is a contradiction of man

Man must produce

Production is a result of need

Yes

@Rouqen so material gain is the primary need?

Man needs it to survive and attain happiness

no no @Beemann

Not like money

That's what I think their dichotomy was based off of

Material vs immaterial gain

Nope

I think along the lines of the means to obtain the end

To what end?

There was a question if there is only matter @Beemann

And why should this be a primary?

Ah

I said stronk yes

I thought it was about the dichotomy