I know Gab is too centralized.

all you have to do to kill gab
is go there and post all the atomwaffen crap

and then point to that

platform = vulnerable

That was exactly what the fake media tried to do after the Pittsburgh shooting.

yup

count on it

it will come

verifiability is critical

Yes, we should plan for that.

people must be able to prove what is, and what is not, their content

we cannot allow sane people to be forced onto the same platform as atomwaffen

That's why their accounts have passwords.

they still wind up associated

you simply cannot have a platform

bitchute, dtube, etc. - these will all be discredited

the underlying tech works

but must be deployed, in a verifiable fashion, by each individual speaker

so that we are all responsible for our own speech, and not for atomwaffen

that is the foundation

that is step 1

hey real quick

important question guys

That doesn't require any new invention. The concept of authentication is decades old.

yes

indeed

you ever notice how fucked up tim's teeth are

RFC 1991

lol - let tim and his teeth alone

he's british,

leave him be

we need a kickstarter campaign to fix his teeth

have at - kickstarter would love that

So again everyone else is trying to talk about creating a lefty-proof payments system while you're talking about digital authentication.

his teeth are a reflection of american politics

"crooked" 😉

told you it was a pipedream Devpav 😛

So verifiability is critical, but blockchain (or potentially DAG) solutions have no role to play? How can you verify a datapoint without a persistent publicly verifiable record (which appears to be your bugbear with blockchain - and to be clear, I understand why you feel that way, I just think the tech itself is inevitable)?

carrier pigeon!

yes @devpav I am building the foundation while everyone else chases the cryptocurrency dream