Message from @INNYGMATYK
Discord ID: 695715512587649087
Thus PUTTING HIM INTO CONTACT WITH WAY MORE PEOPLE
*Violating constitution* fuck that. People want to break quarantine and allow this virus to spread, despite continuous requests by state officials to stay home to slow the spread and buy us time to find a cure
Rights are not something to be compromised on, even if it means people die. No amount of lives are more important than freedom. That's my two cents
> But the guy that was out on the ocean BY HIMSELF paddle boarding needed to be arrested?
@FloridaManBoohajideen
Wasn't even referencing that but: K.
Dude was as socially distant as possible and the fucking pigs PLACED HIM NEAR THEMSELVES AND MORE PEOPLE
I'm not disagreeing with you on that being autistic
@Foxhound Sorry I thought THATS where this rant train came from lmao
Is it violating quarantine to drive yourself by yourself to go hiking by yourself?
Where do we draw the line?
But the ONLY way this doesn't become black death 2.0 is if we find a cure. They're already projecting 100k deaths alone from this rn. If this autistic shit continues we won't have that timen
Yes it violates quarentinen
Because the quarantine is to, and i cannot emphasize this enough, *stay. Fucking. Home*
Even though the government is even suggesting solitary out door activities?
Jesus christ that means in your yard not the park 40 miles from you
Running, fishing, etc? I mean there’s a reason why they are keeping the Parks and national Forest open
How ablut this give me an Ak and body armor and ILL enforce the quarantine. And I guarantee I'll stomp your "rights" harder than the government would because there wouldn't be a fucking warning. Stay home or I'll risk your life as hard as you risk mine.
21st century Quarentine Death Squads
I believe that using force (which includes the threat of legal or physical punishment) for exercising freedom of movement, even in a national emergency, is inherently wrong. Dangerous and risky freedom is always going to be morally better than safe control. Yes I would like people to stay home and help solve this problem but using force to *make* people do that is wrong. It is a choice of risks, are you willing to risk getting your friends or family getting sick and die because you want to go out? If so you're a fucking idiot but it is not my place or anyone else's to stop you. However if you are forcing your family or friends to expose themselves that is different. At that point you are infringing on their rights to life and liberty. Government's true role (although govt will disagree) is not to protect people from their own retardation, it is to protect their rights from being infringed by outside and inside forces.
Like I said earlier and I know it sounds harsh but no amount of lives are more important than freedom. Suggesting people stay home is a good, morally positive thing, forcing them against their will is not. The greater good is not good if it infringes on the rights of the individual
^yes
Plus, Self Isolation × Essential Travel Only does **not** stop everyone from going to the same spots - and forcing people to stay home a la prisione isn't going to ""maintain peace or order""
You're FLATTENING a curve - not STOPPING it - and anyone who's keen on trying to stop or restrict THE PEOPLE . . . ehhh . . .
Something Something Indefinite Emergency Powers
Something something, fuck around and find out bitch
( and if we all have a hard time thinking we'll survive an Igloo, imagine trying to survive the Neocon Centric Technocracy of 2030 )
Centrists can suck my the skin between my nuts. Yeah there, that's how much of a indecisive little bitch they are
"I sUPoRt ThE 2Nd BuT..." Stfu and die you statist cuck
"" Et Subicient Eos Servituti Omnia ""
Were any of a slave - We all are
I'll use force to kill people I think endanger the ones I care about, aka my family with respiratory issues or my nurse fiancee
I can infringe on their lives as they have infringed on the lives of me and mine
by choosing to not isolate themselves
In Surgeon Simulator of course
@P I L L A R M A N Where do we draw the line?
You’re going off the guy driving to the woods by himself to go for a hike?
That individual line is up to individuals to decide
Just as it's your individual ability to decide where the line between the use of lethal vs non lethal force on an intruder
I'm not a retard so I'm not talking about some dude going off on his own to be in the middle of nowhere
I'm talking about retards congregating in large groups
Or retards that go to random places with common foot traffic
> You’re going off the guy driving to the woods by himself to go for a hike?
@FloridaManBoohajideen
Yep.
If that's what it takes to defend the masses, yes.