Message from @>_

Discord ID: 523273344217251850


2018-12-14 22:58:33 UTC  

```Force- coercion or compulsion, especially with the use or threat of violence.```
For example I can "forget" your order of stuff from me.

2018-12-14 22:58:40 UTC  

@EndangeredProdigy Still a alternative which contradicts your definition

2018-12-14 22:58:50 UTC  

a VIABLE alternative my god

2018-12-14 22:58:55 UTC  

If you weren't 16, you'd know that people (even you) will ***GASP*** violate the NAP rather than starve.

2018-12-14 22:59:12 UTC  

A mugging would still be by force. A monopoly would still be force due it being capable of coercion, we get that guys?

2018-12-14 22:59:17 UTC  

@EndangeredProdigy Death is viable

2018-12-14 22:59:24 UTC  

we're talking NAP again?

2018-12-14 22:59:34 UTC  

@Crimsom Totally, absolutely agree!

2018-12-14 22:59:44 UTC  

Prove it. Go a week without eating. Won't kill you but will make you think for once in your young life.

2018-12-14 22:59:45 UTC  

Microsoft violated the NAP.

2018-12-14 22:59:46 UTC  

Ok. I'm gonna stop now. I have a paper to write. Good luck to everyone trying to talk to a brick wall lol

2018-12-14 23:00:23 UTC  

@Atkins Ill just trade and benefit mutually from the company

2018-12-14 23:00:34 UTC  

I dont get to die and the company can have my money

2018-12-14 23:00:44 UTC  

That's a weirdly smug final word from someone whose definition of force doesn't include a mugging lol

2018-12-14 23:00:54 UTC  

@Crimsom isn't a mugging the threat of potential force and not actual force?

2018-12-14 23:01:04 UTC  

What’s the latest debate

2018-12-14 23:01:05 UTC  

A days food costs the equivalent of a weeks wages. What then?

2018-12-14 23:01:20 UTC  

Threat of violence falls under force, @Misomania

2018-12-14 23:01:20 UTC  

@Misomania it is, with force it would be a robbery

2018-12-14 23:01:27 UTC  

Then we print more money duh @Atkins

2018-12-14 23:01:32 UTC  

@Misomania Force- coercion or compulsion, especially with the use or threat of violence.

Threat is included in the definition

2018-12-14 23:01:40 UTC  

@Stefan Payne it covers perception of the chance of violence as well

2018-12-14 23:01:44 UTC  

Protip: You aren't Hank Rearden.

2018-12-14 23:01:44 UTC  

The trick of it is that there is ultimately a baseline of force needed for security and cooperation

2018-12-14 23:01:51 UTC  

You are not the ubermensh.

2018-12-14 23:01:52 UTC  
2018-12-14 23:01:59 UTC  

You are not the protagonist of a Ayn Rand novel.

2018-12-14 23:02:07 UTC  

You are arguing on fucking discord like the rest of us.

2018-12-14 23:02:13 UTC  

@Atkins Nice strawman

2018-12-14 23:02:16 UTC  

If you were special, you'd be earning money right now.

2018-12-14 23:02:18 UTC  

"And force, my friends, is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived." - Robert A. Heinlein

2018-12-14 23:02:19 UTC  

I never said I was

2018-12-14 23:02:25 UTC  

So you're not the boot, you're the ant.

2018-12-14 23:02:26 UTC  

so what is the breakpoint between percieved chance of violence and actual possible violence as it occurs?

2018-12-14 23:02:39 UTC  

You're one of the 11M dead Bengalis.

2018-12-14 23:02:56 UTC  

Objectivism is a utopia ideology, its never gonna happen

2018-12-14 23:03:02 UTC  

Seeking truth is not a bad thing @Atkins sheesh why be so harsh on everyone in discord willing to openly discuss ideas

2018-12-14 23:03:03 UTC  

@Zer0 Obscured definition. Someone blackmailing you would be considered violnet then. Though I do agree with the quote.

2018-12-14 23:03:04 UTC  

does the left get to call words violence then, if percieved violence is still violence?

2018-12-14 23:03:09 UTC  

This conversation is shitpost tier. I'll be in debate