Message from @Rouqen

Discord ID: 525430110032101387


2018-12-20 21:49:45 UTC  

yet

2018-12-20 21:49:46 UTC  

Artificial means it is created by artificial means. WE created that intelligence.

2018-12-20 21:49:49 UTC  

you could copy your neural pathways, but it would be cloning, not transfering

2018-12-20 21:49:58 UTC  

That is why computer intelligence is known as A.I... human created intelligence.

2018-12-20 21:49:58 UTC  

You can't transfer biological consciousness....

2018-12-20 21:49:58 UTC  

valid point

2018-12-20 21:50:09 UTC  

point taken @GoldenPhoenix

2018-12-20 21:50:24 UTC  

Intelegence doesn't not fully signify sentience of self though.

2018-12-20 21:50:37 UTC  

That is why you can't create a new body and transfer your mind to it.

2018-12-20 21:50:44 UTC  

Basically you are destroying the original body to make a clone.

2018-12-20 21:50:47 UTC  

we have to make a distinction, though, would they be sentient or sapient?

2018-12-20 21:50:57 UTC  

sometimes bots go down, I have no control over it @4AM_critter 🐉

2018-12-20 21:51:06 UTC  

Sapient

2018-12-20 21:51:07 UTC  

Destroying the original conscious to make a cloned version..

2018-12-20 21:51:09 UTC  

Sapient

2018-12-20 21:51:22 UTC  

I know my stellaris

2018-12-20 21:51:24 UTC  

Sorry for the ping.

2018-12-20 21:51:27 UTC  

sapience would be catastrophic for humans

2018-12-20 21:51:31 UTC  

why?

2018-12-20 21:51:37 UTC  

If we give them citizenship

2018-12-20 21:51:40 UTC  

And right

2018-12-20 21:51:47 UTC  

they have an advantage

2018-12-20 21:51:51 UTC  

Hmmm what kind of video camera is Tim using in this Tim/YouTube Law video? Tim's face is a bit washed out

2018-12-20 21:52:21 UTC  

humans were created through trial and error and genetic modification over thousands of years. We weren't intentionally generated for efficiency

2018-12-20 21:52:27 UTC  

If they overtake society peacefully and rule wisely I don't mind

2018-12-20 21:52:30 UTC  

AI would have an efficiency

2018-12-20 21:52:33 UTC  

Really

2018-12-20 21:52:56 UTC  

I am not a puritan

2018-12-20 21:53:08 UTC  

if they overtake humans even peacefully, that would result in a totalitarian regime because that's the most efficient system

2018-12-20 21:53:33 UTC  

But they have emotion

2018-12-20 21:53:39 UTC  

Emotion is inefficient

2018-12-20 21:53:47 UTC  

who gives them emotion?

2018-12-20 21:53:51 UTC  

humans?

2018-12-20 21:53:55 UTC  

Obviously

2018-12-20 21:53:59 UTC  

You need to make human existence mutually beneficial for A.I.

2018-12-20 21:53:59 UTC  

Science

2018-12-20 21:54:16 UTC  

just checking, because a computer wouldn't create emotions for themselves, they are inefficient

2018-12-20 21:54:18 UTC  

Basically A.I. can't live without us.

2018-12-20 21:54:25 UTC  

unless there's a specific reason for them to be there

2018-12-20 21:54:27 UTC  

Well it would have to be both sentient and sapient. To feel and think outside of the orriginal intent of the program.

2018-12-20 21:54:51 UTC  

emotion must exist in the structure