Yes @GoldenPhoenix

They also need to learn Empathy and Understanding.

so they'd need purpose. what purpose would they choose?

That's when we mix religion in

To be able to put themselves in our shoes.

that's the biggest unknown

Understand our point of view.

AI that can live without us is already the gist of unsupervised learning algorithms.

Religion time

And to sympathizes with us.

Anyways AFK.

A.I. also need to feel pain. >.>

Now AFK.

In essence, sympathy and empathy... hence why i would give them that ability to look all over the world to see every human in their struggles and to have that discussion.

In the word of spiritualists from stellaris, "thinking machines are an affront to nature"

Bullshit word

Vertebrates are thinking machines.

How about giving them pain systems

Any organism with 2 nerve cells is a thinking machine.

Semantics

I think that would be good... it's a way to understand the biological.

my brother came up with a way to make AI that works with humans but without using the 3 laws system

you can not fully explain pain, but to experience it... that is much more of a commonality to work from.

wow

but i don't remember it yet

pewds talking about sargon

I don't mind the 3 laws

finally got to this video)

But I don't like limitations

https://youtu.be/Q9pfRe7Jd0M?t=1109

bad time link wahtever just keep watching haha

Those 3 Laws would be considered oppression by the A.I. you know.

Not if they are in their brain structure

here's my question: why are we making something and then giving rights to it? it may sound heartless, but if we're their creators, why create them with needs that should be protected?

Because science

that's not a good reason

I know

people have been tortured and killed for "science"

Why not

People have been tortured and killed for "God" as well.

Having a new species essentially