Well, so what

@Scribblehatch 👉 *poke*

you can think that

lmao

lol

you're right and you can think the opposite

which is what's beautiful about it

I don't actually block anyone anyway, but I support it

banning I don't support

if someone is actually harassing you, then blocking is fine

deplatforming I don't support

I blocked that tard who was spamming loli erotica earlier.

but if they upset you with an opinion or statement, blocking is dumb

@devpav that's fine too

good coz its against Discord TOS

loli is against TOS, so to be fair, banning them is more self-defense of the server

banning's perfectly acceptable if someone's doing something against TOS that could get the server shut down, but for anything else disagreeable, block, block away!

as who knows what discord will do

Discord staff are generally SJW

its actually why you need to accept to the rules before joining. its partly so we can get away with more than what the TOS would normally allow

its also why Dank still has a server

We all know that Discord is owned by SJWs.

"You can't do much because everyone agreed to this"

TOS is important to pay attention to

oh right Danks server LUL

and yes, Discord is pretty left leaning

what are we screaming about now

Here's something fucked that you shouldn't do.

from what i understand, they really hate the existence of danks server

Adding new rules and enforcing them RETROACTIVELY

as are most social tech companies @Grenade123

yes

but its funny

"No furries!"
"Hey furry from yesterday! DIE!!"

because discord is marketed to gamers

which apparently leftists hate

I'm a furry and gamer

hmm

**KILL IT**

retroactive banning is what SJW mobs do to 10 year old twitter posts