**Tgyhu8#1149** just left the server.

the buyer is not at fault

Because not informed

and thats the whole thing about "without consent" vs. "against someones will". Its flipping the burden of proof.

What is the difference mate?

I am really at a loss

Genuinely

Plox explain

Yay! I'm done.

They wanted $5 for a dark style extension in the Apple Store for Safari.

I just wrote my own script.

Jesus

Fuck apple

Mens rea. If you arent made aware that the person doesnt want whats going on, with "against someones will" you are covered, with "without consent" its on you if you dont have (valid) consent

It just inverts the entire page, but it was annoying that images are inverted.

So they just get double inverted.

So

Roofies are legal?

no

They can't show disagreement

Not against their will

Or fucking passed out people

can't show disagreement

why are you roofying them then if they want it anyways?

Then they would say they want it

Aka

Consent

If I roofie them

They can't say no

Not against their own will

@Rouqen okay justify to me please why you would roofie them if you believe that they want to have sex with you?

I wouldn't

Looks nice now.

If I want to have sex with someone however

I can

And no one will be able to do shit

Without consent laws

Double edged sword

[MeToo intensifies]