Hmm, that link doesn't do anything on my version of firefox...it's only 6 years old or something, I don't feel like updating either, cuz they mess up my layout.

eh, i don't use minds anyway. Never been big on social media. I watch videos that's about it.

I mean minds is nifty

But id rather hang out on twitter and reddit to intentionally poke at the opposition since they dont like it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiXjiJ5GSoM

bunch of white liberals "we want to help the homeless.....wait, you want to build a large apartment building for cheap housing?! YOU FASCIST!"

Like is said in the video, that's the problem...it's illegal to build residential >3 stories high

in SF

stupid as hell

freedom house published today new report predictably saying orange man bad... 😉

but how deep can you build

yellow sections have a maximum building height of 40 feet

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dc-museum-features-ivanka-vacuuming-exhibit-mocking-first-daughter

oh boy

that is a good question, but presumably you cannot dig/build very deep

And I am not entirely sure what impact earthquakes have on underground building.

The government should not regulate families

Except in cases of pedophilia, spouse abuse, child abuse or polygamy

i those are crimes lmfao

that's not even regulating that's just arresting

Yes

Wth

i dont think govt CAN regulate families in the usa unless it's the cannot leave ur child until he's 18

and if ur in canada

then lol ur fucked

Thats what im tryna say but im just hyperautistic

cuz if u arent fine with ur kid being lgbtbbq it's time to tkae him away

Fkn hell

Child abuse is one thing

But thats fkn state funded kidnapping

However I do believe abuse should be extended to psychological abuse as well

oh yeah

hold on fam lemme see if i can find that canada article

https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/bills/parliament-41/session-2/bill-89

this is the bill

notice the nice and happy bill name

@byathy

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-ontario-passes-totalitarian-bill-allowing-govt-to-take-kids-from-c

```
“The implication is that intervention should not be presumed to be more disruptive than non-intervention,” the ARPA report adds.

Statements by Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau clearly signaled the pro-LGBTQ, gender ideology Liberal agenda, critics warned.

Coteau, who introduced the bill, told QP Briefing he sees questioning teenagers’ self-identification as LGBTQI or telling them to change as abuse.

“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” he said.

“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”
```

http://www.realwomenofcanada.ca/bill-28/

```
“We already see similar tyranny happening in other jurisdictions, such as Norway, where the main child protection service there, Barnevernet, has been involved in numerous high profile seizures of children from traditionally-principled families,” he added.

Fonseca pointed out the Liberal bill gives legal cover for government workers to discriminate against Christians who want to adopt or foster children.

“Even before Bill 89 was passed, but immediately after its introduction in December, I learned of several Christian couples who were turned down for adoption on account of their deeply held religious beliefs about traditional marriage and human sexuality,” he told LifeSiteNews.

This reveals the “stunning hypocrisy and anti-Christian bigotry” of the left, Fonseca said.

The Ontario court in 1995 ruled “for the first time in Canadian history that it was ‘discriminatory’ of the Child and Family Services Act to not allow homosexual couples to bring a joint application for adoption.”

But the “same activists who cried discrimination in 1995 [are] now actively legislating the same discrimination upon Bible-believing Christians, by banning them from having children through adoption,” Fonseca said.
```