He's hit-or-miss

Ok yeah I hope doug ford repeals that shit

But yeah, you actually feel bad for her

@yearspastmatter i guess he never misses

huh

Because she admits she's mentally ill

and you can't help but admire her honesty

im subbed to jean francoiis but i dont evne watch his vids lol

Haven't watched his shit since the Kraut drama

Besides that

So here is what is defined as abuse

Fuck it is too long

kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMTdA_7uu2U

yeah that was a weird one

bigly if trigly

(2)  A child is in need of protection where,

  (a)  the child has suffered physical harm, inflicted by the person having charge of the child or caused by or resulting from that person's,

           (i)  failure to adequately care for, provide for, supervise or protect the child, or

          (ii)  pattern of neglect in caring for, providing for, supervising or protecting the child;

  (b)  there is a risk that the child is likely to suffer physical harm inflicted by the person having charge of the child or caused by or resulting from that person's,

           (i)  failure to adequately care for, provide for, supervise or protect the child, or

          (ii)  pattern of neglect in caring for, providing for, supervising or protecting the child;

   (c)  the child has been sexually abused or sexually exploited, by the person having charge of the child or by another person where the person having charge of the child knows or should know of the possibility of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation and fails to protect the child;

  (d)  there is a risk that the child is likely to be sexually abused or sexually exploited as described in clause (c);

(2)  A child is in need of protection where,

  (a)  the child has suffered physical harm, inflicted by the person having charge of the child or caused by or resulting from that person's,

           (i)  failure to adequately care for, provide for, supervise or protect the child, or

          (ii)  pattern of neglect in caring for, providing for, supervising or protecting the child;

  (b)  there is a risk that the child is likely to suffer physical harm inflicted by the person having charge of the child or caused by or resulting from that person's,

           (i)  failure to adequately care for, provide for, supervise or protect the child, or

          (ii)  pattern of neglect in caring for, providing for, supervising or protecting the child;

   (c)  the child has been sexually abused or sexually exploited, by the person having charge of the child or by another person where the person having charge of the child knows or should know of the possibility of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation and fails to protect the child;

  (d)  there is a risk that the child is likely to be sexually abused or sexually exploited as described in clause (c);

JF is usually on point but it's like he only understood 25% of Tim Pool's stance

@yearspastmatter did he actually say that tho

i doubt tim would say that

btw, what email did tim say the other day you could send tshirt designs to? i lost the vid and didn't write down the email

sexual exploitation and fails to protect the child;

  (d)  there is a risk that the child is likely to be sexually abused or sexually exploited as described in clause (c);

  (e)  the child requires treatment to cure, prevent or alleviate physical harm or suffering and the child's parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide the treatment or access to the treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to the treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 and the parent is a substitute decision-maker for the child, the parent refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to the treatment on the child's behalf;

   (f)  the child has suffered emotional harm, demonstrated by serious,

           (i)  anxiety,

          (ii)  depression,

         (iii)  withdrawal,

         (iv)  self-destructive or aggressive behaviour, or

          (v)  delayed development,

         and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the emotional harm suffered by the child results from the actions, failure to act or pattern of neglect on the part of the child's parent or the person having charge of the child;

g)  the child has suffered emotional harm of the kind described in subclause (f) (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) and the child's parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide services or treatment or access to services ortreatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to thetreatment to remedy or alleviate the harm;

  (h)  there is a risk that the child is likely to suffer emotional harm of the kind described in subclause (f) (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) resulting from the actions, failure to act or pattern of neglect on the part of the child's parent or the person having charge of the child;

    (i)  there is a risk that the child is likely to suffer emotional harm of the kind described in subclause (f) (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) and that the child's parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide services or treatment or access to services or treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to treatment to prevent the harm;

k)  the child's parent has died or is unavailable to exercise custodial rights over the child and has not made adequate provision for the child's care and custody, or the child is in a residential placement and the parent refuses or is unable or unwilling to resume the child's care and custody;

    (l)  the child is younger than 12 and has killed or seriously injured another person or caused serious damage to another person's property, services or treatment are necessary to prevent a recurrence and the child's parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide services or treatment or access to services or treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to treatment;

(m)  the child is younger than 12 and has on more than one occasion injured another person or caused loss or damage to another person's property, with the encouragement of the person having charge of the child or because of that person's failure or inability to supervise the child adequately;

  (n)  the child's parent is unable to care for the child and the child is brought before the court with the parent's consent and, where the child is 12 or older, with the child's consent, for the matter to be dealt with under this Part; or

  (o)  the child is 16 or 17 and a prescribed circumstance or condition exists.

Nothing

Is about religion

All religions fall under Creed

@dobatag he did say that, but on a tweet.

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

And the child's Creed is to be respected as per the bill

I think you can only abuse someone who cant retaliate like elders or children

Unless you adopt a Muslim kid and try to force them to convert you are fine

Or if you abuse a form of power like a husband beating a dependent wife

Though is all this law based that im reading?

🤔

Is this how child abuse is seen by the books?

Oh thats what this is about. My bad

@My Preferred Pronoun Is Sama https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1083545120073543682

oh hes not saying being white or whiteness is racist

hestalking about ppl that say "whiteness this or whiteness that" is racist in and of itself

cuz reducing down to skin color