I can show you conviction rates?

you guys are trolling eachother

If that's what you mean

how would we go about finding out the crime rate

@Aghost we also dont know that people who were never incarcerated or convicted didnt commit acrime, either.

Cody thinks it cant be done

"we are not sure, therefor whatever!" nice arguments

You cant estimate crime rates

But unless you at the seen of EVERY SINGLE CRIME and recorded it

"yeah the incarceration rate of blacks i like... 10 times higher... but that doesnt mean they are more criminal ... i mean... what if they made an error"

t.cody

And know EVERY SINGLE GUILTY criminal

"nobody knows... really"

@Aghost thats not what he was saying.

it is what he is saying

in essence

no

the main point i think was use convictions not incarceration rate

Then how do you prove crime rates

how many shark attacks are there each year?
- "well nobody knows, sometimes its not a shark, its ... some other fish. so we cant be sure" t.cody

Wha other metric would you use

Conviction is a closer judge of crime rates

Still not 100%

But way better than incarceration rates

but

you think the crime ratee, is something that can never be known?

like quantum physics

all people who commit crimes are criminals

Incarceration is used for anyone in prison

Or in jail

but what are you trying to say

Im sure male feminists have high incarceration rates, too. In that case there is a quite obvious reason for false incarceration (while rapists probably would also be attracted to feminism)

You could still be awaiting trial

Which means you have not been FOUND guilty yet

but they are criminals... right?
unless something went wrong with the process?

ye 99% chance they did something

so you are ... leaning on an error? to prove that blacks arent really that criminal?

or something?

ur argument is really really weak

No, a criminal is someone who is found GUILTY of a crime