Message from @Cody
Discord ID: 544521514620551189
Cause agian, we csnt prove for certain that a person commited a crime
HAHAA GOTCHA
GOTCHA CODY
THAS ALL YOU HAD TO SAY
All we have are conviction rates
TO SHOW UR BIAS
WELL DONE
?
what bias has he shown?
a bias for due process?
so, if someon is convicted of a crime
we still dont really know if h did it?
I can show you conviction rates?
you guys are trolling eachother
If that's what you mean
how would we go about finding out the crime rate
@Aghost we also dont know that people who were never incarcerated or convicted didnt commit acrime, either.
Cody thinks it cant be done
"we are not sure, therefor whatever!" nice arguments
You cant estimate crime rates
"yeah the incarceration rate of blacks i like... 10 times higher... but that doesnt mean they are more criminal ... i mean... what if they made an error"
t.cody
And know EVERY SINGLE GUILTY criminal
"nobody knows... really"
it is what he is saying
in essence
no
the main point i think was use convictions not incarceration rate
Then how do you prove crime rates
how many shark attacks are there each year?
- "well nobody knows, sometimes its not a shark, its ... some other fish. so we cant be sure" t.cody
Wha other metric would you use
Conviction is a closer judge of crime rates
Still not 100%
But way better than incarceration rates
but
you think the crime ratee, is something that can never be known?
like quantum physics
all people who commit crimes are criminals