Message from @BEE
Discord ID: 546011912136163329
If I argue that someone must be right simply because they have a PhD, I wonder if that shouldn't be an ad hominem.
pls
explain
@kodec ad hominem is "You're stupid, therefore your argument is also wrong"
sounds good
as if someones intelligence can affect a fact
I actually forgot what the argument was
Hmmm ... in popular use, yes.
i am basically retarded
No that's an appeal to authority Undead
Since everyone is insulting everyone
I guess.
Ad hominem appeal to personal shit rather than logic
But you can also argue from a positive property of a person, without it being an appeal to authority.
ad hominem is something that a very smart npc says everyday
The mechanisms of the fallacy are the same as with a negative ad hominem.
ad homie
ad hominem is ignoring the actual arguments truth, and base the facts soley on the persons character
"If they are bad, they CLEARLY can't speak truth"
Npc
Yes, character, but why always a negative aspect?
adds homie
aids homie
If I rather believe someone I like personally, does that not rely on the same mechanisms of argumentation?
Add hormones
thats just general bias
Yes, but based on the person.
ad hominem is that you reject the argument based on someones character
not that you have a preference for an argument
Otherwise you could say the same about the negative case.
aids hemorrhoids
I think there should be a case for positive ad hominem.
there is none
"That person is a (blank) so of course they are lying and you can't trust what they are saying" Ad Hominem attack
it's also called ad hominem, it's just the defense of it
khann
my mann
hemorrhoids
"this person is trustworthy because of {unrelated situation}"
btw, what is it with these weirdos coming into this discord, making grand claims of being so smart
then doing nothing to back it up?
If I attack an argument by attacking the person, should I not also be able to seek to substantiate an argument by not attacking but elevating a person?
it's also called a "false expert" I think