Message from @BEE

Discord ID: 546011912136163329


2019-02-15 16:54:41 UTC  

If I argue that someone must be right simply because they have a PhD, I wonder if that shouldn't be an ad hominem.

2019-02-15 16:54:42 UTC  

pls

2019-02-15 16:54:44 UTC  

explain

2019-02-15 16:54:52 UTC  

@kodec ad hominem is "You're stupid, therefore your argument is also wrong"

2019-02-15 16:55:00 UTC  

sounds good

2019-02-15 16:55:01 UTC  

as if someones intelligence can affect a fact

2019-02-15 16:55:03 UTC  

I actually forgot what the argument was

2019-02-15 16:55:05 UTC  

Hmmm ... in popular use, yes.

2019-02-15 16:55:05 UTC  

i am basically retarded

2019-02-15 16:55:07 UTC  

No that's an appeal to authority Undead

2019-02-15 16:55:10 UTC  

Since everyone is insulting everyone

2019-02-15 16:55:17 UTC  

I guess.

2019-02-15 16:55:29 UTC  

Ad hominem appeal to personal shit rather than logic

2019-02-15 16:55:36 UTC  

But you can also argue from a positive property of a person, without it being an appeal to authority.

2019-02-15 16:55:46 UTC  

ad hominem is something that a very smart npc says everyday

2019-02-15 16:55:53 UTC  

The mechanisms of the fallacy are the same as with a negative ad hominem.

2019-02-15 16:55:53 UTC  

ad homie

2019-02-15 16:55:57 UTC  

ad hominem is ignoring the actual arguments truth, and base the facts soley on the persons character

"If they are bad, they CLEARLY can't speak truth"

2019-02-15 16:55:59 UTC  

Npc

2019-02-15 16:56:16 UTC  

Yes, character, but why always a negative aspect?

2019-02-15 16:56:24 UTC  

Ad homie talking to homer

2019-02-15 16:56:26 UTC  

adds homie

2019-02-15 16:56:36 UTC  

aids homie

2019-02-15 16:56:38 UTC  

If I rather believe someone I like personally, does that not rely on the same mechanisms of argumentation?

2019-02-15 16:56:41 UTC  

Add hormones

2019-02-15 16:56:49 UTC  

thats just general bias

2019-02-15 16:57:02 UTC  

Yes, but based on the person.

2019-02-15 16:57:06 UTC  

ad hominem is that you reject the argument based on someones character

not that you have a preference for an argument

2019-02-15 16:57:11 UTC  

Otherwise you could say the same about the negative case.

2019-02-15 16:57:17 UTC  

aids hemorrhoids

2019-02-15 16:57:42 UTC  

I think there should be a case for positive ad hominem.

2019-02-15 16:57:49 UTC  

there is none

2019-02-15 16:57:50 UTC  

"That person is a (blank) so of course they are lying and you can't trust what they are saying" Ad Hominem attack

2019-02-15 16:57:58 UTC  

it's also called ad hominem, it's just the defense of it

2019-02-15 16:58:01 UTC  

khann

2019-02-15 16:58:03 UTC  

my mann

2019-02-15 16:58:10 UTC  

hemorrhoids

2019-02-15 16:58:18 UTC  

"this person is trustworthy because of {unrelated situation}"

2019-02-15 16:58:27 UTC  

btw, what is it with these weirdos coming into this discord, making grand claims of being so smart

then doing nothing to back it up?

2019-02-15 16:58:30 UTC  

If I attack an argument by attacking the person, should I not also be able to seek to substantiate an argument by not attacking but elevating a person?

2019-02-15 16:58:36 UTC  

it's also called a "false expert" I think