Yup

@𝗧𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘀 have you read the sentencing remarks?

@Hammond_of_Texas anyone with a different opinion than you is a troll.

or is "www.judiciary.uk" fake?

Jesus

@dragonoftheeast yeah - his mate Dave who did a Dynamo and vanished (no joke)

yes I read that.

Are you trolling or are you really this dense @𝗧𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘀

@𝗧𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘀 how about the lawyer? or the judge? I'm sure they would find it strange that all the headlines for the next week consisted of lies.

all bribed and silenced obviously

like you see the things he said? from multiple witnesses ?

it was illegal for independent journalist to report on.

or you've perhaps never heard of *money*

@𝗧𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘀 - you is just making shit up now. gtfo

commit die

also don't use terms like reverse terrorism

it's terrorism

nig

use domestic if you wanna be anal

What about reverse reverse terrorism tho

I worded it shite, but I meant that terrorism happens in both directions

all that shit reminds people is reverse __buzzword__

@Liam https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/finsbury-park-mosque-attack-terror-terrorism-darren-osborne-jailed-life-murder-jo-cox-mair-rigby-a8192326.html

tbh i think all those 48 people are crisis actors

is there even a death certificate on the dead person?

pfft. and if there is, so what?

ever heard of photoshop

at what point was it illegal to report on the Finsbury Park attack?

It's pretty easy to tell if a photo has been photoshopped

i mean if you get babby's first editor ye

Sorry I only read news that I find on /pol

otherwise a still shot can be manipulated beyond your ability to tell

@Liam im pretty sure if you see something that very well might be illegal you cant be detained for reporting to the authorities even if its not illegal.

meaning its not really *illegal* to report it

@Jizzlobber I'm assuming you've never touched photoshop in your life

http://theconversation.com/why-media-reporting-of-finsbury-park-attack-differs-from-that-of-other-incidents-79797

is it said in the sentencing that he was not charged under terrorism, but under another part of legislation

As I have made clear this was (in the terms of paragraph 4(c) of Schedule 21 to
the Criminal Justice Act 2003) a murder done for the purpose of advancing a
political, religious, racial or ideological cause. Equally, and in accordance with
the provisions of the Counter Terrorism Act 2008, this was a murder with a
terrorist connection, which is an aggravating feature. It is accepted on your
behalf that this is so.

assume everything you want to asume, free world

Once it is in court the restrictions are lifted.

won't make you any less wrong