π§πΆπππ (Discord ID: 474231278938357771), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Follow safe browsing practices including JavaScript blockers like NoScript.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
120 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/1
Please Tweet these @ Joe Rogan we are trying to get the interviews confirmed!
When does the church stream start?
Thanks, changed the thumbnail
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/502266058040672266/502521188313202689/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/502266058040672266/502520724737622021/unknown.png https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/10/NPC-4-che.jpg https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/502266058040672266/502520887254319104/unknown.png
<:GWslippyPeepoH:407618458872971264>
@Nidalap Rorrim no antisemitism plz
@Nidalap Rorrim you are not allowed to criticize jews because that is antisemitism. get educated on it plz
@Nidalap Rorrim whats your fur affinity?
no I love jews.
It would be better if the government just granted the blacks land in the townships. then they could take out loans on their properties and develop them. They have been urbanising since apartheid. They don't want to live in the middle of nowhere rural areas where there are no jobs.
the majority party the ANC, goes along with what the EFF wants. its like an extension of the same party.
@Nidalap Rorrim and the ANC is considering land expropriation because of the proposal made by the EFF, what is your point again?
you are disputing that it is not the majority. when the majority is clearly entertaining it and pushing it.
does not matter that it was initially proposed by the fastest growing political party which is still quite small. because the majority picked it up and ran with it.
@Nidalap Rorrim ANC represent the majority vote. Are you able to comprehend that?
<:GWseremePeepoF:402867825901043712>
are you up early?
<:GWslippyPeepoHugged:407618441017688064>
<:GWslippyPeepoH:407618458872971264>
that guy was innocent. the only person that died collapsed in the middle of the road in the dark with a heart attack 10 minutes before the van arrived
he wouldn't of got out of his car to check on people unless it was an accident, and he got gang attacked by the muslims when he did that.
I have video of the gang attack where they were kicking him in the face.
the same judge sentenced a muslim that ran over 4 people to 4 years, gave the drunk driver a life sentence.
@VanishedA97 the media called it terrorism immediately before anyone could make sense of what happened, muslims on the scene reported they could smell the alcohol on his breath
I think it was a drunk driving accident.
got evidence of that?
I think you are going by hearsay
what is the source?
yeah or mentally ill, I expect the media to lie about shit like that though
BBC is desperate to portray white males as terrorists.
like they are still reporting in the article ''near a mosque'' it was 2 streets from a mosque. outside the Muslim Welfare office.
as I mentioned I have the video of the aftermath, just searching my computer for it atm.
I mean a raw video. not the BBC's edited version
I never claimed he didnt run anyone over on the road.
that's just reframeing the argument
what I said is that he got out of the van to check on people and got attacked by a mob. kicked in the face etc.
I explained what I said fully. that I think it was a drunk driving accident.
theres no need to take things out of context to claim I said he never ran anyone over. that's dishonest.
quotes from the BBC.
LOL
BBC would never lie right?
I found the video anyway. That's primary evidence of what I said.
if he just wanted to kill them, he wouldnt of stopped and got out though would he, he would of drove off.
he was yeah
which makes me think it was an accident, guy was an alcoholic
according to the BBC.
and every other left wing publication
lol
@Gale yes I do
I work in the media.
you pretend like there is no bias against white men which is laughable
I would accept the court minutes, I don't think BBC quotes hold any water at all.
@Gale I never disputed that he ran people over, you are trying to reframe the argument.
@Gog if most people go along with a lie then its true. ok got it.
funny how you can't cite them then, other than a bcc article.
which has no link to the source
I looked at the article already
where is the link to the court minutes?
that's all I asked for. not random articles where they can write whatever they want.
making them private opens the door wide open for corruption, allows for a scenario where the media can spam fake quotes and then you can't check what the truth is.
I see no reason why the public should not be able to know the truth of what happened.
he's already sentenced.
so its not ongoing.
the video aftermath shows something different than what the court claimed.
he didnt say those things in the video, where is the evidence?
@Deus π where is your proof?
every news outlet supressed the grooming gang scandal for decades, and your trying to make out like im insane for questioning their honesty.
evidence would be video of the guy saying it.
would be nice to see that.
just watched the video.
and he didn't say he did it intentionally.
I know I get it, im not entitled to have a different opinion, or to question stuff that doesn't add up. gotta go along with things mainstream media say happened without evidence to back it up or im nuts.
you can make up bullshit to fit whatever situation you want, the only problem is you won't have evidence to prove it. like video of the guy saying he did it intentionally.
The truth remains the same, it doesn't change
@werthom no you just don't know what evidence is. a quote is fine if backed up by a source. which none of them were.
the debate was weather it was an accident or intentional. of which there is no evidence other than other people's word for it that he did it intentionally.
just believe what your told guys, don't question anything. ofcourse the media would never lie to you. rofl.
@Deus π sure they can when the court minutes are secret. who could prove they made it up?
@Hammond_of_Texas anyone with a different opinion than you is a troll.
yes I read that.
it was illegal for independent journalist to report on.
@Liam courts would never reach an unfair verdict according to you because you are extremely naieve, like they didn't fine dankula for a harmless joke.
onejudgebadallotherjudgesmustbecorrectallthetimeneverquestionanythingbeapefectdrone
yeah secret court. believe everything your told guys.
question nothing
lol
5 guys are going to prison for making a joke about grenfell. and you think its insane to question if there is a bias in the courts. π
lol what did he do, I missed that
but we need our frogs!!
@TheGreenCero Its Tuesday bro
@VanishedA97 don't you ever try to confuse my sexuality ever again bud
π’
will theresa may step down?
Maybe Gritty will be the new Pepe
are you jelly bro?
did the king make you do dirty stuff?
had to make him good... I get you
wtf! i love noodles now
reminds me of ''to catch a predator''
<:whit:458618297026347018>
how do you know how many messages?
I go with quality posts
thesis on what?
only the left wing opinion is correct in education, its a sham
its run by heretical leftists
good luck with your mountain of debt that will never equate to real life skills
120 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/1