25 MW per shot I'm pretty sure

Nah not really

Lol new Russian T14 with 152mm gun can literally shoot nukes

It won't be a discrete 'hey tanks are obslete now scrap em all' but a more of 'nah, we never use these things, just keep updating them for the next 40 years'

***bias***

Railguns destroy thier own barrels quite quickly and need a massive power supply.

railguns arent practical

Make emm coal powered

at all

The power supply and rail wear are the big issue

Best we got on land is like 2 or 3 semi trucks in size for a single railgun

I imagine we'll just relegate the Abrams in a similar way to how we use the A10. Shock and awe work-horse.

That is how it's used now tbh

one of the things fallout 3 did that was cool and good was using these things as the basis of an enclave super weapon

We need mechs

Plasma guns

Are a thing

Even then for such a big target a semi truck is really vulnerable

Just banned

And gay bombs

ETC guns are probably the future

Or just bigger guns

@The Last MethBender mechs wont happen for a LONG time

Mechs are a bad idea

Mechs are a bit shit.

Even HAWKEN ones, which is a shame becasue they're sexy af

Mech would be to easy to take out

Industrial carbon nanotube production will revolutionise railguns tbh

Mechs sadly suck nigger dick

:(

I want to have big tiddie lolis in skin-tight body suits piloting my mechs.

Whit

u wot

loli............................

Hey guys, Danks is streaming

Tank treads would still be easier to use and maintain

no one cares

***L O L I T A I N T E N S I F I E S***

I'm telling!

But the railguns have to stay conductive, and the wear on the surface won't be fixed by the nanotubes

Oh wait aren't they conductive?