at all

The power supply and rail wear are the big issue

Best we got on land is like 2 or 3 semi trucks in size for a single railgun

I imagine we'll just relegate the Abrams in a similar way to how we use the A10. Shock and awe work-horse.

That is how it's used now tbh

one of the things fallout 3 did that was cool and good was using these things as the basis of an enclave super weapon

We need mechs

Plasma guns

Are a thing

Even then for such a big target a semi truck is really vulnerable

Just banned

And gay bombs

ETC guns are probably the future

Or just bigger guns

@The Last MethBender mechs wont happen for a LONG time

Mechs are a bad idea

Mechs are a bit shit.

Even HAWKEN ones, which is a shame becasue they're sexy af

Mech would be to easy to take out

Industrial carbon nanotube production will revolutionise railguns tbh

Mechs sadly suck nigger dick

:(

I want to have big tiddie lolis in skin-tight body suits piloting my mechs.

Whit

u wot

loli............................

Hey guys, Danks is streaming

Tank treads would still be easier to use and maintain

no one cares

***L O L I T A I N T E N S I F I E S***

I'm telling!

But the railguns have to stay conductive, and the wear on the surface won't be fixed by the nanotubes

Oh wait aren't they conductive?

magic nanotubes, still waiting for the promised space lift

Yep

The fbi cant scare you if you have a 100 ton Atlas assault mech with LRM 40s and a heavy guass.

They won't have to

my preferred tank

The army of lolis will pay for thwmselves

The costs of keeping that piece of shit working will

we're closing in on the era of direct fire naval engagement ranges of 300 miles