Message from @IXI
Discord ID: 658589855860654081
bruh
how did you find that out?
did you just do the math?
otherwise we would observe it. ive seen an example of the maths
if its not so slim then plz do a demonstration for us
obviously i can't make a protein. Abiogenesis is still a relatively new theory, and i don't know all that much about it
i do want to know however, why you think your god made it so humans have retrovirus DNA
and why he made us have so much in common with chimps
and if your hypothesis is even provable
or falsifiable
well just like FORD creates a bunch of trucks with almost identical parts and mechanics
he decided to have us be similiar
that doesnt answer the question
why did he give us retrovirus DNA
because he can
and is your hypothesis that god did it demonstrable
or falsifiable
no its not demonstrable, its a belief
ok and what evidence do you base this belief on
it makes a lot of sense to me, therefore only when i witness extra ordinary evidence will i consider changing my belief
well first of all, science of today proves nothing with how we were created. Therefore i think we the creation must have a creator
ok but there is no evidence that we were created
protip: saying we are complex doesnt mean we were created
creation is evidence of creator
bruh
but thats common sense
you can't even prove we are a creation
yuour just asserting
hmmm
i still find it hard to believe we were not created based on our complexity tbh
our complexity can be explained by evolution
im actually about to read Richard Dawkins *the blind watchmaker*, which covers how complex beings could have evolved
like if you take a walk in Antarctica and find an ancient pyramid ( which you dont know and cant trace who built ). A pyramid that is similar to ones in Egypt for example, you can assert it was built by some one
even though you cannot prove there is a builder since you cannot track or identify him
from a logical standpoint, it is highly unlikely the pyramid fell of the sky or gathered over billions of years from the different matter surrounding the area
thats a pretty poor analogy. Pyramids are not alive, and are therefore not subject to evolution
plus we know what pyramids are. All the examples we have of pyramids are those man has constructed
we have evidence that points to them being manmade
and no evidence that points to them occuring naturally
im stating a hypothetical where we dont know who the pyramid builder is
well we have no evidence of proteins forming out of nothing either