Message from @Riley
Discord ID: 658591601207017488
and is your hypothesis that god did it demonstrable
or falsifiable
no its not demonstrable, its a belief
ok and what evidence do you base this belief on
it makes a lot of sense to me, therefore only when i witness extra ordinary evidence will i consider changing my belief
well first of all, science of today proves nothing with how we were created. Therefore i think we the creation must have a creator
ok but there is no evidence that we were created
protip: saying we are complex doesnt mean we were created
creation is evidence of creator
bruh
but thats common sense
you can't even prove we are a creation
yuour just asserting
hmmm
i still find it hard to believe we were not created based on our complexity tbh
our complexity can be explained by evolution
im actually about to read Richard Dawkins *the blind watchmaker*, which covers how complex beings could have evolved
like if you take a walk in Antarctica and find an ancient pyramid ( which you dont know and cant trace who built ). A pyramid that is similar to ones in Egypt for example, you can assert it was built by some one
even though you cannot prove there is a builder since you cannot track or identify him
from a logical standpoint, it is highly unlikely the pyramid fell of the sky or gathered over billions of years from the different matter surrounding the area
plus we know what pyramids are. All the examples we have of pyramids are those man has constructed
we have evidence that points to them being manmade
and no evidence that points to them occuring naturally
im stating a hypothetical where we dont know who the pyramid builder is
well we have no evidence of proteins forming out of nothing either
and i still find it fascinating how perfectly we are built, i cannot emphasize it enough
it takes a lot of deep thought to realize it
creationism has way more evidence and backing than evolution
@ProgrammerVerbatim ok lets hear some
Why are we talking about evolution when we could be talking about rocks?
Watch that
@Riley i have a question for you , why we as humans we have only one shape i mean if the evolution was true there should be many shapes of human , for example there should be a humans with third hand from their neck ? So my point is why we have the monkeys and suddenly they transformed to humans?
Story from my biology teacher incoming...
So, once there were monkeys, they didn't have their hands free because they used them to walk. Once, there was a weird mistake. One of them could stand tall. That was a bit weird, but he was able to see further. This way, he could see dangers come from afar. It helped him to flee earlier, so he survived, unlike his siblings who couldn't stand. This 'mistake' also got kids, who could do the same. They grew out to humans, those who couldn't, were mostly killed by natural selection (this doesn't mean they're extinct, it only means there are more humans). Mistakes with a hand in the neck were also weird (if they existed), but they were no special survivors.
I mean aren’t their signs of humans with a whole fish tail @Citizen Z
I get what ur saying
@ChinaGirlNL (no offense) but this is a joke lol. Yet it didn't answer my question because we cant see the stages of human evolution . If we can see the monkey then we should see the following stages of the evolution but suddenly all of these stages are disappeared with no trace . Can you explain?
_~~Seems like I'm not the only one who doesn't recognise the tone of a joke? 😂~~_
Nobody would get it, but my biology teacher is a funny storyteller, because he's way too enthusiastic about his subject