then what about the big bang

and the formation of the first protein

what are the chances there

we can't assign any probability to the first big bang

the whole "le protine" thing is a huge meme

no we can assign probabilities to it

why cant we

it doesnt take into account the shear number of possible proteins, the fact that the first proteins would have been much simpler, and the amount of time and trials taking place simultaneously

trust me, there are a lot of possible proteins

even so, the chances are too slim

bruh

how did you find that out?

did you just do the math?

otherwise we would observe it. ive seen an example of the maths

if its not so slim then plz do a demonstration for us

obviously i can't make a protein. Abiogenesis is still a relatively new theory, and i don't know all that much about it

i do want to know however, why you think your god made it so humans have retrovirus DNA

and why he made us have so much in common with chimps

and if your hypothesis is even provable

or falsifiable

well just like FORD creates a bunch of trucks with almost identical parts and mechanics

he decided to have us be similiar

that doesnt answer the question

why did he give us retrovirus DNA

because he can

and is your hypothesis that god did it demonstrable

or falsifiable

no its not demonstrable, its a belief

ok and what evidence do you base this belief on

it makes a lot of sense to me, therefore only when i witness extra ordinary evidence will i consider changing my belief

well first of all, science of today proves nothing with how we were created. Therefore i think we the creation must have a creator

ok but there is no evidence that we were created

protip: saying we are complex doesnt mean we were created

creation is evidence of creator

bruh

but thats common sense

you can't even prove we are a creation

yuour just asserting

hmmm

i still find it hard to believe we were not created based on our complexity tbh

our complexity can be explained by evolution