he decided to have us be similiar

that doesnt answer the question

why did he give us retrovirus DNA

because he can

and is your hypothesis that god did it demonstrable

or falsifiable

no its not demonstrable, its a belief

ok and what evidence do you base this belief on

it makes a lot of sense to me, therefore only when i witness extra ordinary evidence will i consider changing my belief

well first of all, science of today proves nothing with how we were created. Therefore i think we the creation must have a creator

ok but there is no evidence that we were created

protip: saying we are complex doesnt mean we were created

creation is evidence of creator

bruh

but thats common sense

you can't even prove we are a creation

yuour just asserting

hmmm

i still find it hard to believe we were not created based on our complexity tbh

our complexity can be explained by evolution

im actually about to read Richard Dawkins *the blind watchmaker*, which covers how complex beings could have evolved

like if you take a walk in Antarctica and find an ancient pyramid ( which you dont know and cant trace who built ). A pyramid that is similar to ones in Egypt for example, you can assert it was built by some one

even though you cannot prove there is a builder since you cannot track or identify him

from a logical standpoint, it is highly unlikely the pyramid fell of the sky or gathered over billions of years from the different matter surrounding the area

thats a pretty poor analogy. Pyramids are not alive, and are therefore not subject to evolution

plus we know what pyramids are. All the examples we have of pyramids are those man has constructed

we have evidence that points to them being manmade

and no evidence that points to them occuring naturally

im stating a hypothetical where we dont know who the pyramid builder is

well we have no evidence of proteins forming out of nothing either

and i still find it fascinating how perfectly we are built, i cannot emphasize it enough

it takes a lot of deep thought to realize it

creationism has way more evidence and backing than evolution

@ProgrammerVerbatim ok lets hear some

Why are we talking about evolution when we could be talking about rocks?

https://youtu.be/_zQXgJ-dXM4

Watch that

@Riley i have a question for you , why we as humans we have only one shape i mean if the evolution was true there should be many shapes of human , for example there should be a humans with third hand from their neck ? So my point is why we have the monkeys and suddenly they transformed to humans?

Story from my biology teacher incoming...

So, once there were monkeys, they didn't have their hands free because they used them to walk. Once, there was a weird mistake. One of them could stand tall. That was a bit weird, but he was able to see further. This way, he could see dangers come from afar. It helped him to flee earlier, so he survived, unlike his siblings who couldn't stand. This 'mistake' also got kids, who could do the same. They grew out to humans, those who couldn't, were mostly killed by natural selection (this doesn't mean they're extinct, it only means there are more humans). Mistakes with a hand in the neck were also weird (if they existed), but they were no special survivors.

I mean aren’t their signs of humans with a whole fish tail @Citizen Z