A book, but same difference

see how your conclusion is used in the evidence?

Yes, I know that I haven't proven anything with my simulation, but I didn't claim it as such

It's possible everyone is wrong and we don't know the true god. Or, the true religion died out. If that is th case,it's going to be terrible if only believers went to this gods "heaven"

not for the believers 😉

I nominate the Ancient Greek Gods. They're much more fun to read about

"Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it"

I don't think you read my whole thing lol PhD

It's possible the true god doesn't have more then a few believers left, and if fait>works, everyone screwwwweeddd

You do not need to be religious to find happiness in non-material things.

And morality doesn't require belief in a god 👌

Morality changes with society even

So what do flat earthers believe is the true nature of the moon?

i dont think there is any consensus, how could we know the nature of the moon?

Well

Telescopes allow us to see it closer up

It very much looks like a solid rocky mass imo

nice

But a solid rocky mass doesn’t align with flat earth theory

why not

Well

In order for the moon to be visible from some places but not from others, the moon has to be close to the ground, like the sun, right?

you tell me

I mean

On a flat earth, shouldn’t the moon be visible from everywhere?

But it isn’t

obviously not

or it would be

I don’t get that

It’s a flat surface, shouldn’t you have a clear line of sight from all points?

Unless it was always cloudy

you get a human*radius of vision*

basically says you can only see so far

which means the sun should be within that distance right?

and stars too right?

stars are dimmer than citys

well from our sight yes

come to us

altschauerberg 8

Top of the morning all.

Gmornin