Different times

**Theory**

And a bad one.

Even in a vacuum

Ok so I have a theory that dragons are real. Does that make it true?

They are real potentially.

In all seriousness.

Dragons, giants, reptilians.

All of them.

Anyway

Back to gravity.

You have a baseless hypothesis.

Theories explain observations

Hypothesis for FE is called walk outside.

I don't see any curve.

That is their purpose

And at NO POINT on Earth can you see it.

*Anyone wanna talk about the Big Bang?* no? Ok <:potatoderp:530552695648419840>

Unobstructed.

So

Even atop mt everest.

Yes you can.

Through a microscope.

Unless its NASA one

@🎃Oakheart🎃 downward acceleration

Shoot

Yes but the difference is that spaceships = fake.

Well actually

It would be much harder to fake microscopes considering people made them long ago and there's no reason to fake them.

Not real.

ISS = on the ground.

CGI?

*Partially quoting Einstein*
Einstein said there is no such thing as a gravitational force. Mass is not attracting mass over a distance. Instead, it’s curving spacetime. If there is no force, then how do you explain acceleration due to gravity? Objects should accelerate only when acted upon by a force; otherwise they should maintain a constant velocity.

Ever heard of CGI.

Lmao

I'm guessing everyone just brushed over my question

CGI can do this

So explain to me why CGI can't make one globe planet?

That looks pretty realistic right there.

And NASA has **Billions**

You underestimate their fakery.