Gravity = Theory.

Why?

**Unproven**

Why is it different?

Same vertical change

*"Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity"*

Different times

**Theory**

And a bad one.

Even in a vacuum

Ok so I have a theory that dragons are real. Does that make it true?

They are real potentially.

In all seriousness.

Dragons, giants, reptilians.

All of them.

Anyway

Back to gravity.

You have a baseless hypothesis.

Theories explain observations

Hypothesis for FE is called walk outside.

I don't see any curve.

That is their purpose

And at NO POINT on Earth can you see it.

*Anyone wanna talk about the Big Bang?* no? Ok <:potatoderp:530552695648419840>

Unobstructed.

So

Even atop mt everest.

Yes you can.

Through a microscope.

Unless its NASA one

@🎃Oakheart🎃 downward acceleration

Shoot

Yes but the difference is that spaceships = fake.

Well actually

It would be much harder to fake microscopes considering people made them long ago and there's no reason to fake them.

Not real.

ISS = on the ground.

CGI?

*Partially quoting Einstein*
Einstein said there is no such thing as a gravitational force. Mass is not attracting mass over a distance. Instead, it’s curving spacetime. If there is no force, then how do you explain acceleration due to gravity? Objects should accelerate only when acted upon by a force; otherwise they should maintain a constant velocity.

Ever heard of CGI.

Lmao