They shouldn't be teaching it because its so far from the truth.

Fins how long it takes for something to fall in Denver

Find*

Buoyancy.

Repeat in London

Thats just height.

Repeat in Toronto

Repeat in Reyjavik

We get the point.

And no.

Each is consistent yet different

Gravity = Theory.

Why?

**Unproven**

Why is it different?

Same vertical change

*"Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity"*

Different times

**Theory**

And a bad one.

Even in a vacuum

Ok so I have a theory that dragons are real. Does that make it true?

They are real potentially.

In all seriousness.

Dragons, giants, reptilians.

All of them.

Anyway

Back to gravity.

You have a baseless hypothesis.

Theories explain observations

Hypothesis for FE is called walk outside.

I don't see any curve.

That is their purpose

And at NO POINT on Earth can you see it.

*Anyone wanna talk about the Big Bang?* no? Ok <:potatoderp:530552695648419840>

Unobstructed.

So

Even atop mt everest.

Yes you can.

Through a microscope.

Unless its NASA one