@Stxrsky- @kieranspy547 Simpletons, do you know the power of Ask.com?

forgot about that one

almighty

that is the true browser

if you can get a plane ticket to Antarctica, then how come people who have been there believe that it is not an ice wall?

Like who?

They visit the outer island chain mostly and look at penguins

what about the peninsula?

@Citizen Z

Thats where tourists go

Lots of penguins

so is there just normal land beneath the glacial ice sheets?

having an earthy peninsula would suggest so

Not sure..i assume there is some land

also, another question

what are faults?

@Citizen Z

Cracks

from?

Joints

so why is new material generated there?

Uplift

so they are standard tectonic plates?

convergent, divergent, transform?

How would i know

you said they are cracks

and listed a bunch of processes

I assumed you understood the jargon

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/484516084846952451/663139028161527835/Mirage_2.gif

No, you aren't wrong for thinking that most flat earthers believe all photos showing a globe are photoshopped by NASA. You are wrong for not assuming that most Flat Earthers (which are people just like me and you) have the tendency to follow along with bandwagons that look to support or defend against a globe earth.

The story and details behind the article of the first photo of earth taken from a high altitude (I won't say outer space) on the 24th of October 1946 seems fishy but I won't dwell on my feelings of it.

But I can tell you that the picture doesn't show a curved horizon and you can test that yourself with a ruler or a piece of paper. Although indeed it is at an angle which is easily provable.

I'm never fully satisfied until I get the chance to do a high altitude recording myself with a non fish eye lens camera lens. But other independent researchers have shown a straight horizon without fish eye lens cameras.

You must not assume that all flat earthers agree on the same things regarding flat earth as I do not agree with the ice wall more over the dome neither do I agree with the most popular model of the FE. But I do agree with many observable and sensible proofs that we can all agree on.
@baldmartinyt

@California Nightmare 3.0 thank you for that little gif thing, it’s really pretty

Np

@RadRhys https://youtu.be/vj9rXJPpuUw
This is the video

We see one side because the moon rotates at a rate tandem with the Earth.

The cause is, of course, you don't see the 'dark side'

For an object which was formed from accreted matter after an impact with the Earth, that isn't an unlikely eventuality at all.