A lot of the debate stuff is very repetitive, same argument gets repeated by both sides. I try my best to stay away from it and just focus on NASA fuck ups. There are also such an extreme view from both of side, example sun being 3000 miles away for flat earth and 93 million miles away for round earth that there's no middle ground. It's hard to have a productive debate when you have such extremities where no side is willing to compromise.

strawman

lmao that's now how it works

your model has you spinning in 7 directions at once. yet the same beautiful stars every year

in the same constellations

That's beautiful. ^

because the stars we see int the night sky are always moving with us around the center of the galaxy so ofcourse we wouldnt see much deviation from that pattern

"of course" kek

https://giphy.com/gifs/space-astronomy-KvukGjDlASaf6

Everyone uses this and it's so misleading that it's hilarious

add one more rotation. roll down a hill and look at the stars

it's a model of the motion in your model

it's very inaccurate

to put speed into perspective

the earth in that gif takes 1 second to go around the sun

in reality it would take 31 million seconds

...

aka a year

Relativity

Not even

It's simple

Just universe sandbox it

And focus on a particular object

Space is real and straight

When you find out there’s no scientific proof of a globe

When you finally accept the fact that earth is flat

well looks like i'll never look like either of those

I'm never like those two

I don't drink alcohol I don't drink coffee

Cognitive dissonance <:BigGrin:507986757753634826> @Superiorna_Artiljerija