Message from @checkm8
Discord ID: 671524150946562093
well i doubt you can explain most of the stuff you believe either. (and nobody expects you too of course=
I’ve only heard claims
No evidence
can you build your own pc, phone, car engine or whatever? no. you trust in educated people to do the job
why not do that in science too?
If you can't explain it in every detail yourself you can't use any of it, apparently. You cant say that electrons exist without knowing all the intricacies of particle physics and quantum mechanics. Using anything anyone else said is appeal to authority obviously.
Still waiting for scientific proof
what is important is that science and established theories/axioms etc are established because nobody yet falsified them
thats how we choose our believes. we take the best possible explanation that nobody has proven wrong
do you want me to goole you papers on vacc statistics?
i certainly believe you can look it up yourself
Out of curiosity, would an experiment that has been repeated again and agian but that you need special equipment to do yourself be proof?
no
I don’t care about biased studies conducted by the CDC that are funded by big pharma
but if nobody is able to disproof it, its your best guess to trust those results
I’ve posted hundreds of studies that prove the link between autism and vaccines
I asked an earnest question
well can you provide evidence for your arguments then? afterall, it seems even if i provided you some you wouldnt read them because you deem them biased. and for that. do you have evidence?
I did
I'm legitimately curious of what you think
You didn’t even read them
@California Nightmare 3.0 Would you consider an experiment that has been repeated again and again but that you need special equipment to do yourself proof?
you need to give me some time to read through that
impossible to respond on that in a live conversation
Bill gates also admits that vaccines are used for depopulation Bill gates also admits that vaccines are used for deportation
https://youtu.be/eTh6hZ95VX8
@California Nightmare 3.0 i do have an issue with your article or whatever it is. apparently its some literature review of a masters graduate. so this are not the actual restults of studies but rather third party interpretations of a masters graduate from a person of which no detailled credentials or affiliations are linked
You have 156 to go
youtube videos are rarely a good source to support an argument
Would you like it to be on bitchcute instead?
i dont even know what that is supposed to mean
and why do i ahve 156 papers to go. i question the third party review of the papers
did you read all the 157 papers mentioned?
and not just the abstract of this random masters graduate
also scribd does not seem to be any peer reviewed quality publication format
Bullshit
That article cites direct studies done by the CDC, and lists the doctors involved.
im not saying that the content is wrong. the format you presented is just very questionable
!mute @checkm8 being disingenuous
Thank you. What a lying jack ass.