you gotta have some trust in other people

Making baseless claims

well for that there is formal education agreed upon and a certain barrier from other professionals that expose you if you publish wrong stuff.

sometimes this takes a while but for prominent topics this is a pretty fast process

reasearch often receives extensive reviews and counter papers within a week in prestige journals

Using sources is an appeal to authority apparently.

Education
Which is ran by who?
Rockefellers

Federal reserve etc

well i doubt you can explain most of the stuff you believe either. (and nobody expects you too of course=

I’ve only heard claims
No evidence

can you build your own pc, phone, car engine or whatever? no. you trust in educated people to do the job

why not do that in science too?

If you can't explain it in every detail yourself you can't use any of it, apparently. You cant say that electrons exist without knowing all the intricacies of particle physics and quantum mechanics. Using anything anyone else said is appeal to authority obviously.

Still waiting for scientific proof

what is important is that science and established theories/axioms etc are established because nobody yet falsified them

thats how we choose our believes. we take the best possible explanation that nobody has proven wrong

do you want me to goole you papers on vacc statistics?

i certainly believe you can look it up yourself

Out of curiosity, would an experiment that has been repeated again and agian but that you need special equipment to do yourself be proof?

no

I don’t care about biased studies conducted by the CDC that are funded by big pharma

but if nobody is able to disproof it, its your best guess to trust those results

I’ve posted hundreds of studies that prove the link between autism and vaccines

I asked an earnest question

well can you provide evidence for your arguments then? afterall, it seems even if i provided you some you wouldnt read them because you deem them biased. and for that. do you have evidence?

I did

I'm legitimately curious of what you think

You didn’t even read them

i am on this severs since yesterday

https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/157-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link?fbclid=IwAR0qoz2mSBld-uf_kAonv5wd0pCVwXrpvuS2wfNu-mLB2I8gzFvHmwzEJ48#scribd

@California Nightmare 3.0 Would you consider an experiment that has been repeated again and again but that you need special equipment to do yourself proof?

you need to give me some time to read through that

impossible to respond on that in a live conversation

Bill gates also admits that vaccines are used for depopulation Bill gates also admits that vaccines are used for deportation

https://youtu.be/eTh6hZ95VX8

@California Nightmare 3.0 i do have an issue with your article or whatever it is. apparently its some literature review of a masters graduate. so this are not the actual restults of studies but rather third party interpretations of a masters graduate from a person of which no detailled credentials or affiliations are linked

You have 156 to go

youtube videos are rarely a good source to support an argument

Would you like it to be on bitchcute instead?

i dont even know what that is supposed to mean

and why do i ahve 156 papers to go. i question the third party review of the papers

did you read all the 157 papers mentioned?