https://i.pinimg.com/originals/af/58/63/af5863c957acd702af83399ad0694514.jpg

The argument is that the visible horizon behind the second rig shouldn't be visible.

Due to the maximum distance with refraction one should be able to see on a globe.

well the GEOMETRIC HORIZON should be NO fartther, and all from, one foot should be 1.22miles

we see ten miles plus

^ Lograin's an expert on this

not expert, but this is basic geometry

the physical line horizon, geometric horizon, is what glob erfers claim ships disappear over, so this isnt a REFRACTED horizon

You still with us, Siegfried?

this is the issues, so now we can see ten miles at one foot OH proves that R of glob model is wrong

an to match our observations R would have to be 230,000miles

I have no idea wtf he’s talking about

So you dont geometry

okay

we can see farther than we're supposed to

“well the GEOMETRIC HORIZON should be NO fartther, and all from, one foot should be 1.22miles” what?...

you glob model asserts a PHYSICAL horizon

What do u mean we can see farther

called a GEOMETRIC HORIZON

this is the PHYSICAL: line you asssert ships dissappear over

BUT we do not OBSERVE this

when you calculate the GH from OH of one foot its 1.22 miles

and its impossible to see farther

as there is a PHYSIACAL obstruction

either the 'curve' water or land

that you think excists

https://m.imgur.com/a/omjRt5Q

but we see ten miles

Check that image out

so theres no GH

without GH there NO R

or R is 230,000 miles

Same guy, same video same camera same location different day

so either way you cannot have a glob

glob RIP

https://m.imgur.com/a/omjRt5Q

Look at that image

yes, this is the Horizon as FE tells it is

NOT A PHYSICAL thing

if you assert a NON PHYSICAL horizon youre Flat Earthers