Message from @Logrian
Discord ID: 690329334933880904
An appeal to faith is not something I would consider during a debate either. A lot of flat earthers around here will be happy to provide you with a lot of evidence and experiments.
Evidence?
What evidence
Also what experiments
Well, I actually just had a talk earlier today with another staff member about the Black Swan evidence.
I'll pull it up, just a sec
The argument is that the visible horizon behind the second rig shouldn't be visible.
Due to the maximum distance with refraction one should be able to see on a globe.
well the GEOMETRIC HORIZON should be NO fartther, and all from, one foot should be 1.22miles
we see ten miles plus
^ Lograin's an expert on this
not expert, but this is basic geometry
the physical line horizon, geometric horizon, is what glob erfers claim ships disappear over, so this isnt a REFRACTED horizon
You still with us, Siegfried?
this is the issues, so now we can see ten miles at one foot OH proves that R of glob model is wrong
an to match our observations R would have to be 230,000miles
I have no idea wtf he’s talking about
So you dont geometry
we can see farther than we're supposed to
“well the GEOMETRIC HORIZON should be NO fartther, and all from, one foot should be 1.22miles” what?...
you glob model asserts a PHYSICAL horizon
What do u mean we can see farther
called a GEOMETRIC HORIZON
this is the PHYSICAL: line you asssert ships dissappear over
BUT we do not OBSERVE this
when you calculate the GH from OH of one foot its 1.22 miles
and its impossible to see farther
as there is a PHYSIACAL obstruction
either the 'curve' water or land
that you think excists
but we see ten miles
Check that image out
so theres no GH
without GH there NO R
or R is 230,000 miles
Same guy, same video same camera same location different day
so either way you cannot have a glob