as i said.

u cant experiment without a hypothesis lol

the experiment is the step after you formed your hypothesis (after you made the initial observation).

yes step one pbserve a natural phenomena step 2 hypothesis step 3 experiment

i agree.

u think u got some of that for the heliocentric model ?

but you need a complete observation to formulate your hypothesis correctly.

not just partial data

a complete observation of a natural pbserved phenomena sure lol

so ur observation is a cloudless night sky lets hear ur hypothesis

or, several data points.

if you have 3 points of observation, you should be able to make a pretty accurate model

u only need one natural pbserved phenomena

u dont need 3 observations or 4 just 1

you need to view it from different.... angles

no u dont

u just need to observe a natural phenomena from one angle

ok , 2 observations could be enough to formulate a crude hypothesis

would u like me to run u through the scientific method with some actual science

one from north, one from south

u only need one observation to make a hypothesis

here we go step one observe a natural phenomena water boils step 2 hypothesis water boils at 100 degrees celsius at 1 atmosphere of pressure step 3 we will experiment to see if this is correct

the problem here is, you dont make *any* assumptions before your observations, so you have to check if the hypothesis could be refuted, by making a second observation, from a different place

incorrect u check to see if ur hypothesis is correct by experimentation

u will presume a cause for the effect u observed in step one

its clear u dont understand how the scientific method works

ok, lets assume you would make the hypothesis that earth is flat, after you make the first observation of the star sky. you now want to check if that hypothesis is true or false? what would you propose to check it?

one more demonstration that u do not understand how science works

is the earth flat is a what is quesstion science only deals with how or why questions

earth is flat is also an incoherent hypothesis on face value anwyays

Science tries to research the form of things, not only how they work.

step one observe a natural phenomena water boils step 2 hypothesis water boils at 100 degrees celsius at 1 atmosphere of pressure step 3 we will experiment to see if this is correct

example of real science

like i said come back when u figure out how science works

So how would you prove your hypothesis, that earth is flat?

And how would it be refuted?

a proof would be if the star sky is also flat.

the earth is flat is an invalid hypothesis

that means, constellations would look the same from any location on earth.

u dont know how to form a hypothesis

let me form a hypothesis for you, Jeremy.