u must observe a natural phenomena

u think its any observation ?

The goal is of course to understand how the stellar constellations are connected, and what their form is.

first off u said u dont need a hypothesis for an experiment lol its obvious u dont know how science works u have clearly demonstrated that to this whole group

to make a hypothesis, you need to first make your observations.

when u say observation u mean observe a natural phenomena ?

yes.

and u think u can do an experiment without a hypothesis ?

yes or no

To make any hypothesis, you need data first.

to make a hypothesis u only need your natural observed phenomena

would u like an example of a real science experiment

Of course you can start with a hypothesis, but i proposed it this way, so that your experiment is unbiased.

(like a randomized study)

u dont start with hypothesis step one is observe a natural phenomena step 2 is hypothesis

as i said.

u cant experiment without a hypothesis lol

the experiment is the step after you formed your hypothesis (after you made the initial observation).

yes step one pbserve a natural phenomena step 2 hypothesis step 3 experiment

i agree.

u think u got some of that for the heliocentric model ?

but you need a complete observation to formulate your hypothesis correctly.

not just partial data

a complete observation of a natural pbserved phenomena sure lol

so ur observation is a cloudless night sky lets hear ur hypothesis

or, several data points.

if you have 3 points of observation, you should be able to make a pretty accurate model

u only need one natural pbserved phenomena

u dont need 3 observations or 4 just 1

you need to view it from different.... angles

no u dont

u just need to observe a natural phenomena from one angle

ok , 2 observations could be enough to formulate a crude hypothesis

would u like me to run u through the scientific method with some actual science

one from north, one from south

u only need one observation to make a hypothesis

here we go step one observe a natural phenomena water boils step 2 hypothesis water boils at 100 degrees celsius at 1 atmosphere of pressure step 3 we will experiment to see if this is correct

the problem here is, you dont make *any* assumptions before your observations, so you have to check if the hypothesis could be refuted, by making a second observation, from a different place

incorrect u check to see if ur hypothesis is correct by experimentation

u will presume a cause for the effect u observed in step one

its clear u dont understand how the scientific method works