because sometimes they do

and its useful to know

you might also have several independent variables

no u must systematically manipulate the indpeendent variable to make sure it is the cause of ur effect

Well you're going to change it but really were arguing semantics here

if u have more than one iv then its inconclusive and u failed

because I understand what you are trying to say and I agree with the point

and that is what I meant

I was just being a bit pedantic

so u think step one is ask a question ? does that sound realistic

u think is my wife making meatloaf tonight a science thing ?

come on

we only disagree on the first step and it doesnt really matter. The main point is there is an idea, an inspiration for the experiment

anyway I really do have to do this report

so I will be in and out from here on

how can u disagree do u not understand that u can not form a hypothesis without observing a natural phenomena

jeremyToday at 8:48 PM
step one observe a natural phenomena water boils step 2 hypothesis water boils at 100 degrees celsius at 1 atmosphere of pressure step 3 we will experiment to see if this is correct

how would u make that hypothesis without knowing water boils

^^^

it really hurts my head cause i go through this nonstop

people think u can form a hypothesis without observing a natural phenomena lol

ok here is my hypothesis elephants fly in snowfall under direct moonlight

dang elephants dont fly

do u just guess random hypothesis then go see if the effect actually happens that would take forever

its inane to think u can make a hypothesis without first observing a natural phenomena

Honestly I thin k they should send everyone to space for like 5mins to see if the earth is globe or flat, even thou that would the whole world economy crash and every country to go into debt

do u have a claim or point ?

sure right after we go to the second law of thermodynamics violation called outerspace we are going to santas house

what no just see who's right or o you think we can't even get to space atm

do u think earth isnt in a container ?

are u a gas pressure denier

no wtf ?

i just want to see who's right

lol

btw whats your take on other planets ?

if u took a bit to look into this its obvious nasa are frauds and the earth is flat

are they flat

idk what the other planets are if they are spheres its bad logic to assume we are standing upon a sphere cause teh sky is full of spheres

Well do you really think they are observed to be balls?

It’s proof by assertion fallacy @jeremy

lol wrong ping