Message from @Gugl
Discord ID: 691103876123983904
then the experiment is to go and ask her
do u know what science does
thats a very broad question
its not
science proves teh cause to an effect
thats it
do u know what an independent variable is
the variable you can change
the variable u must change
not can u have to systematically manipulate the independent variable which is the cause of the effect
the independent variable is the cause to ur natural pbserved phenomena
the natural observed phenomena is the dependent variable
also its the effect
the effect we are trying to find the cause of
how are u going to even start doing science without knowing the dependent variable
yes, that is true. By can I meant the one you will change but in principle you dont have to. sometimes you leave it the same for a bit to see how the results vary with no change
because sometimes they do
and its useful to know
you might also have several independent variables
no u must systematically manipulate the indpeendent variable to make sure it is the cause of ur effect
if u have more than one iv then its inconclusive and u failed
because I understand what you are trying to say and I agree with the point
and that is what I meant
I was just being a bit pedantic
so u think step one is ask a question ? does that sound realistic
u think is my wife making meatloaf tonight a science thing ?
come on
we only disagree on the first step and it doesnt really matter. The main point is there is an idea, an inspiration for the experiment
anyway I really do have to do this report
so I will be in and out from here on
how can u disagree do u not understand that u can not form a hypothesis without observing a natural phenomena
jeremyToday at 8:48 PM
step one observe a natural phenomena water boils step 2 hypothesis water boils at 100 degrees celsius at 1 atmosphere of pressure step 3 we will experiment to see if this is correct
how would u make that hypothesis without knowing water boils
^^^
it really hurts my head cause i go through this nonstop
people think u can form a hypothesis without observing a natural phenomena lol
ok here is my hypothesis elephants fly in snowfall under direct moonlight
dang elephants dont fly
do u just guess random hypothesis then go see if the effect actually happens that would take forever
its inane to think u can make a hypothesis without first observing a natural phenomena