Message from @Flat Earth PhD
Discord ID: 651823407335473152
Dude stop avoiding what I'm saying.
it's an example of what happens when you trust everything you "look up"
Your honestly twisting my words.
I just said we don't need pictures from the sky to map stuff
I'm talking mapping from on-earth
I want an independent mapping of all land masses by a non-Freemason associated group, with complete and verifiable documentation of the entire process and access to the raw data
then....and only then....would I even consider a map reliable
So, I'm right, you think every mapper ever is a liar
well so far....every "space agency" is a liar
so....
why not?
I'm not talking about space agencies
Omfg
Im a scientist. I don't have access to the raw data used to generate today's maps
and we already have evidence of large organizations deceiving us
I'm not just talking about today's maps
I'm talking about even the earliest maps
But of course apparently all this conspiracy started from the beginning of time or something
OK. let's suppose we pick one older map. what is your protocol to verify the accuracy of all land masses?
;_; dude, you clearly are not getting ANYTHING I am saying.
What I'm saying is that we have never had a flat map that had no distortions. Also, you can calculate country sizes quite easily, might just take some time.
how do I "calculate country sizes"?
Looking smaller-scale, mapping how far away cities are from each other, towns, rivers, ect. I'll do it myself when i have time.
But unless you think they even lie about how far apart cities are no one can truly hide the size of a country
And I'm quite sure people would notice if they lied about how far cities were away from one another
If you want to annoy GE idiots and take skeptics like TeamSkeptic , who banned me from his idiotic server , just ask them 2 questions
They always say " WE EXAMINE AND MAKE OUR PREDICTIONS BASED ON OBSERVATIONS" - ask them about the red shifting galaxies and dark energy
something that 100000% debunks the whole idiotic graBity belief
and its 'observable' for them
Oh I know about the red shifting galaxies some
I forget if the red shift means they are going away or coming closer
away, and more distant they look, more red shift they appear
Ah, thx
and if they keep turning back, historically the time, if everything started with the big bang
they shouldnt move away with such speed, it even accelerate in their observations 🤣
I haven't heard of dark energy yet, just dark matter
10000% debunking the whole idiotic Relativity
Just because we do not know something does not mean it is completely wrong, but I'll save my judgement until after you show me what papers said they shouldn't be moving away that fast. Idk you might have a good point
https://youtu.be/Nxhk_Iqcx_8 TeamSkeptic , fake skeptic, got destroyed by Wotan
I was hoping for a paper oof, I can do.most thinks without a scientific paper, but red shifting galaxies are not one of those