Message from @carlito

Discord ID: 658737426818138123


2019-12-23 18:23:31 UTC  

So fake

2019-12-23 18:23:38 UTC  

Why is it all dark then?

2019-12-23 18:23:40 UTC  

If the Earth was round, tables would be round too, to prevent items from rolling off, but no they are flat and so is the Earth.

2019-12-23 18:23:44 UTC  

I thought there were galaxies and stars.

2019-12-23 18:24:47 UTC  

@Amthyric i fail to see why you keep saying gold is not volatile and how that relates to anything stated? Could you explain what that means to you? That is why I asked you if you knew all the states of gold. I was assuming you knew your model and could easily understand the application of it in mine and the processes that occur that correlate. I have now shown you several examples of processes associated with my model and evidence from your model that these are known processes.

2019-12-23 18:25:00 UTC  

same with this fakery.

2019-12-23 18:25:06 UTC  

ISS = fake.

2019-12-23 18:25:15 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/658736899569090590/in-interviews-with-inverse-six-nasa-astronauts-describe-the-moment-when-everything-changed.png

2019-12-23 18:25:32 UTC  

@Sassy Undeniably LC said gold travels between the oceans and the sun via evaporation

2019-12-23 18:25:55 UTC  

Gold ions, the material he said moves, is nonvolatile

2019-12-23 18:26:00 UTC  

If the Earth was round, tables would be round too, to prevent items from rolling off, but no they are flat and so is the Earth.

2019-12-23 18:26:02 UTC  

It will not evaporate

2019-12-23 18:26:03 UTC  

maybe it's gravity that's pulling those lights away from the original recording source device

2019-12-23 18:26:08 UTC  

Under sunlight

2019-12-23 18:26:19 UTC  

@Sassy Undeniably states of gold are solid, gas and liquid u sure you are using the right terminology?

2019-12-23 18:26:29 UTC  

If gold doesn't move to the sun

2019-12-23 18:26:35 UTC  

The theory is wrong

2019-12-23 18:26:40 UTC  

If the Earth was round, tables would be round too, to prevent items from rolling off, but no they are flat and so is the Earth. @everyone

2019-12-23 18:26:59 UTC  
2019-12-23 18:26:59 UTC  

2019-12-23 18:27:21 UTC  

gravity does almost everything remember, that Focault Pendulums and Frame of Reference pretty much covers the rest

2019-12-23 18:27:32 UTC  

@Amthyric Why do you think gold needs to move to the sun if it is made of gold? I am curious.

2019-12-23 18:28:04 UTC  

Because LC, the guy who originated your model, said it is necessary for the salt bridge

2019-12-23 18:28:39 UTC  

No one has amended it to not require aqueous gold flow

2019-12-23 18:28:50 UTC  

So it is falsifiable

2019-12-23 18:29:02 UTC  

And is, indeed, false

2019-12-23 18:29:20 UTC  

As gold does not go airborne in an ionic state

2019-12-23 18:29:26 UTC  
2019-12-23 18:30:23 UTC  

Also don’t use gravity in arguments, we don’t know much about it

2019-12-23 18:31:27 UTC  

Also gold moving to the sun?? Wtf

2019-12-23 18:33:04 UTC  

yes i think that is true, we don't know much about it

2019-12-23 18:39:22 UTC  

@Amthyric Now you are just ignoring the informatin about gold and if you don't know the states and what causes it to be ionized which is just a breaking of it's bonds then well that is just willful ignorance and I never said that we know everything about how the processes work. I said this is what we have seen and can prove that is also information about known processes on your model so in fact you are saying your model is false. Not mine. You are not making any sense young man. secondly I think you need to re watch his video and write down what is mention and look up those process so you have a full understanding and don't argue needlessly. You can't argue against things that we both agree are natural and proven processes. If you don't understand the possibility of the model that is why he let you know of Mr. Piggot and his proven experiment as it relates to yours and gravity but to me it just explains the ability of the luminaries to levitate indefinite and infinitely. You really should try understanding our model and stop trying to argue against it without proof of your own models validity other than unproven theory's that can't be applied to the scientific method and are just models at best. Follow threw is what your model lacks.

2019-12-23 18:40:48 UTC  

Aqueous gold doesn't even have bonds to break

2019-12-23 18:41:18 UTC  

but i feel i've learnt enough to know the way it is defined and described by the mainstream is false

2019-12-23 18:41:49 UTC  

Stop saying states of gold

2019-12-23 18:42:19 UTC  

React the same regardless

2019-12-23 18:42:33 UTC  

Just at different rates

2019-12-23 18:42:55 UTC  

But there are the same products made

2019-12-23 18:45:01 UTC  

that's part of the problem Sassy,, we don't have a full blown agreed upon working model as yet, so we are at a disadvantage, aren't we; or do we have one that i am not aware of

2019-12-23 18:51:33 UTC  

@Amthyric your stuck on gold and not looking at the overall processes. Your stuck on one aspect that you think you can argue down to show how it won't work but you don't know what these elements are capable of because you are assuming you know everything about them. Can you Create Gold from scratch? Have you ever? Can you tell me all the applications of gold? You are stuck on a small aspect mentioned as to how something could be possible with known elements and the process of a battery and missing the whole big picture. I thought you said that gold is elemental and only gold but here you are breaking it down into different states so go figure. Your not denying that it has other states and reacts to other compounds, elements and goes through processes your arguing for it's application in my model. My model although you would like to argue against is not a model but what we actually see. Now i subscribe to two explanations of what it could be it doesn't mean that it is or that it can be fully explored because as you know we aren't aloud to go and do our own research to find out if it is as you say complete. We would like to complete our studies of our plain so could you hurry up and at least agree that your model needs a resolution so we can explore the possibilities together as true scientist performing scientific methods on the models we subscribe to? Maybe you know someone who is part of the Antarctic treaty or someone you can call to get me and all my buddies who are professionals in their field passes to do just what I have suggested? No?

2019-12-23 18:52:11 UTC  

i've decided i'd like to attempt to construct one, , i'd like to try and complete this mission in poster sized drawing form with very little text .. a new years resolution will start and follow soon .. maybe you could help out a bit when im almost done because you seem to have quite bit of knowledge about things that i haven't researched all that much