this is CGI or fish eye lens

cgi more likely

It’s pretty

is that meant to be 'space' in the right hand corner

lol

So fake

Why is it all dark then?

If the Earth was round, tables would be round too, to prevent items from rolling off, but no they are flat and so is the Earth.

I thought there were galaxies and stars.

@Amthyric i fail to see why you keep saying gold is not volatile and how that relates to anything stated? Could you explain what that means to you? That is why I asked you if you knew all the states of gold. I was assuming you knew your model and could easily understand the application of it in mine and the processes that occur that correlate. I have now shown you several examples of processes associated with my model and evidence from your model that these are known processes.

same with this fakery.

ISS = fake.

@Sassy Undeniably LC said gold travels between the oceans and the sun via evaporation

Gold ions, the material he said moves, is nonvolatile

If the Earth was round, tables would be round too, to prevent items from rolling off, but no they are flat and so is the Earth.

It will not evaporate

maybe it's gravity that's pulling those lights away from the original recording source device

Under sunlight

@Sassy Undeniably states of gold are solid, gas and liquid u sure you are using the right terminology?

If gold doesn't move to the sun

The theory is wrong

If the Earth was round, tables would be round too, to prevent items from rolling off, but no they are flat and so is the Earth. @everyone

!mute @Bobuhlynatinington

gravity does almost everything remember, that Focault Pendulums and Frame of Reference pretty much covers the rest

@Amthyric Why do you think gold needs to move to the sun if it is made of gold? I am curious.

Because LC, the guy who originated your model, said it is necessary for the salt bridge

No one has amended it to not require aqueous gold flow

So it is falsifiable

And is, indeed, false

As gold does not go airborne in an ionic state

@Sassy Undeniably

Also don’t use gravity in arguments, we don’t know much about it

Also gold moving to the sun?? Wtf

yes i think that is true, we don't know much about it

@Amthyric Now you are just ignoring the informatin about gold and if you don't know the states and what causes it to be ionized which is just a breaking of it's bonds then well that is just willful ignorance and I never said that we know everything about how the processes work. I said this is what we have seen and can prove that is also information about known processes on your model so in fact you are saying your model is false. Not mine. You are not making any sense young man. secondly I think you need to re watch his video and write down what is mention and look up those process so you have a full understanding and don't argue needlessly. You can't argue against things that we both agree are natural and proven processes. If you don't understand the possibility of the model that is why he let you know of Mr. Piggot and his proven experiment as it relates to yours and gravity but to me it just explains the ability of the luminaries to levitate indefinite and infinitely. You really should try understanding our model and stop trying to argue against it without proof of your own models validity other than unproven theory's that can't be applied to the scientific method and are just models at best. Follow threw is what your model lacks.

Aqueous gold doesn't even have bonds to break

but i feel i've learnt enough to know the way it is defined and described by the mainstream is false

Stop saying states of gold