too slowly? how slow does a balloon move at that height?

your proof of everything nasa has done was because the russians would've called them out if it was fake? is it really that easy to fool you guys and to make you believe in what ever they want

Dont believe me

A balloon? Wasnt it a hologram disguised as a plane?

Believe the evidence

No, but it is a noticeable point.

there are 2 theories i know of,, a balloon with lights is one a hologram is another

World leaders shaking hands and having lunch. Doesnt take a brain surgeon to figure it out

Keep in mind, if the Earth is round then it is you the one who is being played for a fool. So please let's try to not throw insults or names at each other just yet.

Well how is it a balloon? Is it above the dome?

Russia china and US took over korea and had puppet government there after world war 2

That they did.

who said it was 'above the dome?"""

And then the Korean War happened because of it

you keep suggesting that it might be above the dome

You think they just gave north korea away

Eh?

They literaly had a puppet installed

Well it moves slowly like the stars and other planets beyond the dome. Is that a bad inference?

The USSR financed and armed a large portion of the DPRK military

History makes no sense

Those T-34/85s didn't come from nowhere

The US did the same for the ROKAF

Granted that was with hodge-podge armaments

lets say the ISS is a smallish balloon, not very high up, with lights connected, using tethering tech to propel.. wouldn't the joke be on us thinking it's this spectacular thing orbiting earth

@Thinky do you know about the antarctic treaty?

M20 75mm, a few WW2 57mm RRs

Etc.

M18 57mm, I believe it was.

You know so much about the military...surely you know about mind control and false flags

Misdirection

Tactics

Etc

I know of it, though I also know that no such MC reached any IOC

Chechnya was a blatant example of the RF doing similar

Incidentally, Iraq was not fought for oil or liberation

@Thinky if you're going to stick with your position on that, i have a question for you. if they were such big enemies and hated each other that much, why would they sign the antarctic treaty which didn't benefit anyone? don't you think there is a possibility that they are working together?

But a more nuanced agenda

@Flat earth BEAST Because the governments are not a homogenous unit, some times making political and diplomatic gestures can be used as ammunition later down the line

but it benefits the Polar Bears doesnt' it? they're SO CONCERNED about Polar bears and the health of our environment you see

Such as "we helped with that treaty, and now they want XYZ!"