Message from @Flat earth BEAST

Discord ID: 662429474331033619


2020-01-02 22:56:46 UTC  

@Thinky ever heard of top secret technology

2020-01-02 22:56:47 UTC  

hes asking rtarded questions

2020-01-02 22:56:52 UTC  

how do u explain the planets in solar system to someone?

2020-01-02 22:56:54 UTC  

The fallacy is called "Appeal to Authority"

2020-01-02 22:57:01 UTC  

stop asnwering thinky

2020-01-02 22:57:02 UTC  

please

2020-01-02 22:57:02 UTC  

has this picture been doctored?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/662429171418660874/flat_earth_map.jpg

2020-01-02 22:57:06 UTC  

I have, and KH-11 and KH-12 are such

2020-01-02 22:57:12 UTC  

@Thinky stfu

2020-01-02 22:57:12 UTC  

It has been drawn

2020-01-02 22:57:14 UTC  

stfu

2020-01-02 22:57:16 UTC  

stfu

2020-01-02 22:57:18 UTC  

nobody cares

2020-01-02 22:57:21 UTC  

stop answering himi

2020-01-02 22:57:23 UTC  

please

2020-01-02 22:57:28 UTC  

how do u explain the planets in solar system to someone?

2020-01-02 22:57:37 UTC  

@Thinky yes, that's what it boils down to. you have to rely on absolute proof that what these authoritative figures are putting out are real, not really proof

2020-01-02 22:57:47 UTC  

And so do you. @Flat earth BEAST

2020-01-02 22:57:57 UTC  

How can you prove that photos you share are not doctored?

2020-01-02 22:58:05 UTC  

With certainty, that is improbable.

2020-01-02 22:58:14 UTC  

it's on you to prove that they are real

2020-01-02 22:58:16 UTC  

I think that is our point Thinky

2020-01-02 22:58:18 UTC  

As 100% certainty is not probable for what we are looking to.

2020-01-02 22:58:41 UTC  

I cannot provide proof without sharing images from OPSEC

2020-01-02 22:58:43 UTC  

you have to rely on NASA words that they are real and guess what, they have lied in the past

2020-01-02 22:58:44 UTC  

How can you prove that photos of satelites have not been doctored, for example

2020-01-02 22:58:48 UTC  

In this case, that is of course standing for

2020-01-02 22:58:56 UTC  

Open-Source Security

2020-01-02 22:59:02 UTC  

Wait what? In court if someone presents evidence (no matter what it is) and someone claims it's not true, the burden of proof is on the accuser claiming it isnt true.

2020-01-02 22:59:58 UTC  

So if I show a picture of JFK being shot with a laser beam not a bullet and someone says that's fake, it's their job to prove it wrong.

2020-01-02 23:00:02 UTC  

Point is, OPSEC is as influenced by governmental influences are you yourself are.

2020-01-02 23:00:16 UTC  

Saying they are taking it, I could with the same conviction accuse you of the same.

2020-01-02 23:00:22 UTC  

Both are equally pointless statements.

2020-01-02 23:01:16 UTC  

@Thinky it always boils down to putting faith in what the organization said or posted the picture is truth, putting faith in something is not proof

2020-01-02 23:01:19 UTC  

Well for something so pointless it sure is taking up a lot of space here

2020-01-02 23:01:22 UTC  

Wrong

2020-01-02 23:02:28 UTC  

Lol

2020-01-02 23:02:46 UTC  

Then you succumb to the same failing

2020-01-02 23:02:51 UTC  

besides nasa has lied in the past, an informative source that lies once has its credibility ripped off

2020-01-02 23:02:59 UTC  

You out faith in your own organizations, your own circle of people.

2020-01-02 23:03:11 UTC  

It is something we all do, to "assume" on some basic principles.