the only satellite i assume to be real is the iss and even that has shown some signs of being a hologram

Because they were taken by what we call OPSEC

How do u measure size and distance

Burden of proof is on the accuser btw.

But to know with certainty? You cannot.

can yall

please

@Thinky relying on authority fallacy

ignore

thinky

And you cannot know anything with certainty.

ignore him

@Thinky ever heard of top secret technology

hes asking rtarded questions

how do u explain the planets in solar system to someone?

The fallacy is called "Appeal to Authority"

stop asnwering thinky

please

has this picture been doctored?

I have, and KH-11 and KH-12 are such

@Thinky stfu

It has been drawn

stfu

stfu

nobody cares

stop answering himi

please

how do u explain the planets in solar system to someone?

@Thinky yes, that's what it boils down to. you have to rely on absolute proof that what these authoritative figures are putting out are real, not really proof

And so do you. @Flat earth BEAST

How can you prove that photos you share are not doctored?

With certainty, that is improbable.

it's on you to prove that they are real

I think that is our point Thinky

As 100% certainty is not probable for what we are looking to.

I cannot provide proof without sharing images from OPSEC

you have to rely on NASA words that they are real and guess what, they have lied in the past

How can you prove that photos of satelites have not been doctored, for example

In this case, that is of course standing for

Open-Source Security

Wait what? In court if someone presents evidence (no matter what it is) and someone claims it's not true, the burden of proof is on the accuser claiming it isnt true.