The goal is proving the globe, seems relevant to me.

I can show you a selenelion eclipse and say its debunks the globe so what

Im talking about direct measurements

Other than a bad understanding of refraction of light at far distances what else do you have? That's not what you solely base your reality on is it

whats a selenelion

Huh

Selenelion is another ultra rare atmospheric phenomena

ive never heard of it

https://www.space.com/27338-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-sunrise-selenelion.html

Again..more assumptions

Notice globe isnt afraid of it, it's a known quantifiable optic.

It looks flat and cant be a globe. But its a globe. Lol

But please do tell how we cast a round shadow on the moon and somehow arent a sphere.

Its a lie

Your inability to grasp how atmospheric phenomena work is showing

It's a lie = his proof

How does the darkening on the moon go top down?

this selenelion thing is interesting

The darkening goes top down while moon and sun are above horizon

Impossible

On a globe

is this guy a flat earther? he has flat earth role

https://youtu.be/nK0_bVedJDs

https://science.howstuffworks.com/lunar-eclipse.htm

Maybe you need to read up

@TheNidhugg mayne you.need to

Round shadow = must be cast from a sphere unless you are saying its not the earths shadow.

Quit changing the subject

Its not a shadow

I brought up the subject rofl

You assume it is

Guys the earth is a triangle

!mute @fluenza