You keep saying that but I dont think you know what it means
Show me in experiment mountaina lifting up 3 miles into the air
So it just looks flat but its globe?
Nice evidence
Show me how your link derived the refraction value
And then show a demonstration of infrared seeing more refraction
I already showed you a link debunking the refraction being the best fit on a globe earth.
You didn't debunk anything
Infrared refracts like other spectrum light.
You are the one with a belief and youre lying now
Point is it isnt a proof of anything.
I can show you a lunar eclipse and say its proof of a sphere earth
ok
Shifting the goal post
The goal is proving the globe, seems relevant to me.
I can show you a selenelion eclipse and say its debunks the globe so what
Im talking about direct measurements
Other than a bad understanding of refraction of light at far distances what else do you have? That's not what you solely base your reality on is it
whats a selenelion
Huh
Selenelion is another ultra rare atmospheric phenomena
ive never heard of it
https://www.space.com/27338-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-sunrise-selenelion.html
Again..more assumptions
Notice globe isnt afraid of it, it's a known quantifiable optic.
It looks flat and cant be a globe. But its a globe. Lol
But please do tell how we cast a round shadow on the moon and somehow arent a sphere.
Its a lie
Your inability to grasp how atmospheric phenomena work is showing
It's a lie = his proof
How does the darkening on the moon go top down?
this selenelion thing is interesting
The darkening goes top down while moon and sun are above horizon
Impossible
On a globe
is this guy a flat earther? he has flat earth role
https://youtu.be/nK0_bVedJDs
https://science.howstuffworks.com/lunar-eclipse.htm
Maybe you need to read up
@TheNidhugg mayne you.need to
Round shadow = must be cast from a sphere unless you are saying its not the earths shadow.
