Its done in infrared

Why does that matter.

Let me find comparison for you

These were both taken by the same guy at the same time in the same place.

You can see that the visible spectrum one is compressed

Sadly for the globe, it should be the visible spectrum that is "lifted up" by refraction more than the infrared.

https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com/2017/11/pic-gaspard-3880mgrand-ferrand-2758m.html?m=1

Just found a link that explains it in detail.

Tldr refraction

Thats the 2014 record

This is 2019

Infrared

It's still the same shot

No it isnt

It was done in infrared

You keep saying that but I dont think you know what it means

Show me in experiment mountaina lifting up 3 miles into the air

So it just looks flat but its globe?

Nice evidence

Show me how your link derived the refraction value

And then show a demonstration of infrared seeing more refraction

I already showed you a link debunking the refraction being the best fit on a globe earth.

You didn't debunk anything

Infrared refracts like other spectrum light.

You are the one with a belief and youre lying now

Point is it isnt a proof of anything.

I can show you a lunar eclipse and say its proof of a sphere earth

ok

Shifting the goal post

The goal is proving the globe, seems relevant to me.

I can show you a selenelion eclipse and say its debunks the globe so what

Im talking about direct measurements

Other than a bad understanding of refraction of light at far distances what else do you have? That's not what you solely base your reality on is it

whats a selenelion

Huh

Selenelion is another ultra rare atmospheric phenomena

ive never heard of it

https://www.space.com/27338-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-sunrise-selenelion.html

Again..more assumptions

Notice globe isnt afraid of it, it's a known quantifiable optic.

It looks flat and cant be a globe. But its a globe. Lol

But please do tell how we cast a round shadow on the moon and somehow arent a sphere.