Message from @Metallica
Discord ID: 664326862377320469
I too am passionate about astronomy.
But not "space"
Are you a legitimate concave earther?
well, i can't completely understand the concepts of physics or how the spacs/time continuum works
It is very interesting and I advise you to look into it
but mind you, i'm open minded for further criticism
So, because you cannot comprehend the teachings of an authority, you believe in it because of the majority?
It’s not very complex stuff
Unless you think there aren't people smarter than you, there are going to be conclusions that you are intellectually incapable of coming to on your own
What do you suggest to be done then
no, i can understand the teachings of an authority, and disregard the majority, i do not believe in skme
either because i've proved it wrong or because it sounds too sketchy
Just because there are people more intelligent than you, that does not mean they cannot be wrong.
which is true
You don't need to only take their word on it depending on what we're talking about
Yes but the fact there are people more intelligent than you, suggests that they can come to conclusions you are intellectually incapable of coming to, because they are more intelligent than you. The question is, what do you do now? You have a conclusion that could be true or false, that a person intellectually superior than you has come to, and that you are incapable of coming to
No.
There is a lot of stuff we can do with limited intelligence
Do you prescribe some confidence in the person being smarter than you, or do you disregard the conclusion on the basis you are incapable of coming to it yourself
Especially when it comes to proving the earth's shape
^
You compare the evidences of both parties, and choose what is empirical.
The problem with the modern pillar of science, is that so much of it is theoretic.
That’s ironic....
depends, we can't go to a black hole and prove how it reverses space and time's places in some form
You can take the evidence of both parties and still come to a conclusion that doesn't line up with reality due to misunderstanding the actual evidence
^^^^^^^
Agreed.
Which points to what?
You have 2 parties, both of them at odds with eachother.
Are we talking about the earth specifically?
Well, you can choose to keep that in mind, but I think you'll find that the Hegelian dialectic is one of the oldest tricks in the book, and covers a vast majority of territories.
We talking about black holes? OwO
not exactly, but
:v
Actually we can go into a black hole but you might not be able to prove anything if yer dead
"we can go into a black hole"
Sure thing kiddo.
Sure thing.
?
