Message from @mc crafting1

Discord ID: 664327114333487125


2020-01-08 04:34:41 UTC  

It is very interesting and I advise you to look into it

2020-01-08 04:34:42 UTC  

but mind you, i'm open minded for further criticism

2020-01-08 04:35:05 UTC  

So, because you cannot comprehend the teachings of an authority, you believe in it because of the majority?

2020-01-08 04:35:43 UTC  

It’s not very complex stuff

2020-01-08 04:35:52 UTC  

Unless you think there aren't people smarter than you, there are going to be conclusions that you are intellectually incapable of coming to on your own

2020-01-08 04:35:55 UTC  

What do you suggest to be done then

2020-01-08 04:36:10 UTC  

no, i can understand the teachings of an authority, and disregard the majority, i do not believe in skme

2020-01-08 04:36:24 UTC  

either because i've proved it wrong or because it sounds too sketchy

2020-01-08 04:36:25 UTC  

Just because there are people more intelligent than you, that does not mean they cannot be wrong.

2020-01-08 04:36:36 UTC  

which is true

2020-01-08 04:37:10 UTC  

You don't need to only take their word on it depending on what we're talking about

2020-01-08 04:37:22 UTC  

Yes but the fact there are people more intelligent than you, suggests that they can come to conclusions you are intellectually incapable of coming to, because they are more intelligent than you. The question is, what do you do now? You have a conclusion that could be true or false, that a person intellectually superior than you has come to, and that you are incapable of coming to

2020-01-08 04:37:31 UTC  

No.

2020-01-08 04:37:33 UTC  

There is a lot of stuff we can do with limited intelligence

2020-01-08 04:37:43 UTC  

Do you prescribe some confidence in the person being smarter than you, or do you disregard the conclusion on the basis you are incapable of coming to it yourself

2020-01-08 04:37:45 UTC  

Especially when it comes to proving the earth's shape

2020-01-08 04:37:46 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/664326862377320468/image0.jpg

2020-01-08 04:37:51 UTC  

^

2020-01-08 04:38:08 UTC  

You compare the evidences of both parties, and choose what is empirical.

2020-01-08 04:38:35 UTC  

The problem with the modern pillar of science, is that so much of it is theoretic.

2020-01-08 04:38:46 UTC  

That’s ironic....

2020-01-08 04:39:16 UTC  

depends, we can't go to a black hole and prove how it reverses space and time's places in some form

2020-01-08 04:39:53 UTC  

You can take the evidence of both parties and still come to a conclusion that doesn't line up with reality due to misunderstanding the actual evidence

2020-01-08 04:40:06 UTC  

^^^^^^^

2020-01-08 04:40:14 UTC  

Agreed.

2020-01-08 04:40:18 UTC  

Which points to what?

2020-01-08 04:40:49 UTC  

You have 2 parties, both of them at odds with eachother.

2020-01-08 04:41:03 UTC  

Are we talking about the earth specifically?

2020-01-08 04:42:07 UTC  

Well, you can choose to keep that in mind, but I think you'll find that the Hegelian dialectic is one of the oldest tricks in the book, and covers a vast majority of territories.

2020-01-08 04:42:13 UTC  

We talking about black holes? OwO

2020-01-08 04:42:46 UTC  

not exactly, but

2020-01-08 04:42:50 UTC  

:v

2020-01-08 04:43:08 UTC  

Actually we can go into a black hole but you might not be able to prove anything if yer dead

2020-01-08 04:43:27 UTC  

"we can go into a black hole"

2020-01-08 04:43:32 UTC  

Sure thing kiddo.

2020-01-08 04:43:36 UTC  

Sure thing.

2020-01-08 04:43:39 UTC  

?

2020-01-08 04:43:45 UTC  

we cant :v

2020-01-08 04:43:56 UTC  

give up on the physical sciences

2020-01-08 04:43:59 UTC  

i didnt confirm or deny such information

2020-01-08 04:43:59 UTC  

pursue mathematics