well, i agree with the NASA statements, for an instance

Truther <:smart:484956754489376781>

eh

idk

What nasa statements?

Truther is more of a person who doesn't give a duck about the gov't

So you do.

well, such as the Moon Landing

You feel as if the government has your best interests in mind.

I see.

i sort of do, yes

well, no

No is the right answer.

I believe they do it for the country not so much the people if that makes sense

i do feel passionate about astronomy

Your sentence made as much sense as the capability of rats flying @mc crafting1

Lol rats can fly on Titan tho so ur insult is invalid

I too am passionate about astronomy.

But not "space"

Are you a legitimate concave earther?

well, i can't completely understand the concepts of physics or how the spacs/time continuum works

It is very interesting and I advise you to look into it

but mind you, i'm open minded for further criticism

So, because you cannot comprehend the teachings of an authority, you believe in it because of the majority?

It’s not very complex stuff

Unless you think there aren't people smarter than you, there are going to be conclusions that you are intellectually incapable of coming to on your own

What do you suggest to be done then

no, i can understand the teachings of an authority, and disregard the majority, i do not believe in skme

either because i've proved it wrong or because it sounds too sketchy

Just because there are people more intelligent than you, that does not mean they cannot be wrong.

which is true

You don't need to only take their word on it depending on what we're talking about

Yes but the fact there are people more intelligent than you, suggests that they can come to conclusions you are intellectually incapable of coming to, because they are more intelligent than you. The question is, what do you do now? You have a conclusion that could be true or false, that a person intellectually superior than you has come to, and that you are incapable of coming to

No.

There is a lot of stuff we can do with limited intelligence

Do you prescribe some confidence in the person being smarter than you, or do you disregard the conclusion on the basis you are incapable of coming to it yourself

Especially when it comes to proving the earth's shape

^

You compare the evidences of both parties, and choose what is empirical.

The problem with the modern pillar of science, is that so much of it is theoretic.