There is a lot of stuff we can do with limited intelligence

Do you prescribe some confidence in the person being smarter than you, or do you disregard the conclusion on the basis you are incapable of coming to it yourself

Especially when it comes to proving the earth's shape

^

You compare the evidences of both parties, and choose what is empirical.

The problem with the modern pillar of science, is that so much of it is theoretic.

That’s ironic....

depends, we can't go to a black hole and prove how it reverses space and time's places in some form

You can take the evidence of both parties and still come to a conclusion that doesn't line up with reality due to misunderstanding the actual evidence

^^^^^^^

Agreed.

Which points to what?

You have 2 parties, both of them at odds with eachother.

Are we talking about the earth specifically?

Well, you can choose to keep that in mind, but I think you'll find that the Hegelian dialectic is one of the oldest tricks in the book, and covers a vast majority of territories.

We talking about black holes? OwO

not exactly, but

:v

Actually we can go into a black hole but you might not be able to prove anything if yer dead

"we can go into a black hole"

Sure thing kiddo.

Sure thing.

?

we cant :v

give up on the physical sciences

i didnt confirm or deny such information

pursue mathematics

<:smart:484956754489376781>

Hey!

I’m saying it’s possible to go into a black hole, but you’d definitely die

Now we're almost talking!

Imagine

Physics is misinterpretated by many

so i guess

Also, The Mandelbrot set...

Black holes are pretty common in our universe. It is likely that most of the billions and billions of galaxies around us have at least one supermassive black hole at their center like ours.

i'm certain all of them do, but you know

there could be an autistc group of stars

that would be considered as a galaxy

And that is where a flat earth lays